1965
DOI: 10.2337/diab.14.8.473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

Abstract: Results are presented of a study undertaken to explore the reproducibility of the 100 gm. oral glucose tolerance test. Over 400 male volunteers from an institutional population, who were not known to be diabetic, participated in a program which included a series of six tests for each individual over a period of one year. Ten men were tested daily, and each retested at intervals of approximately two months. Bloods were drawnat fasting, one, two and three hours after the administration of a 100-gm. glucose drink… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
73
1
5

Year Published

1966
1966
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
73
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It is likely that the changes are specific since: (1) the frequency of impaired glucose tolerance in twins who remain non-diabetic is high (11% ), considerably higher than could be expected for a normal population of this age (about 2%) [20] and (2) impaired glucose tolerance was only found in twins within five years of the diagnosis of the index twin. This clustering of changes in glucose tolerance around the time of diagnosis of the index twin suggests that the changes are not a nonspecific consequence of the potential variability in glucose tolerance [21]. Thus, some twins who remain non-diabetic showed both immune [19] and metabolic changes around the time of diagnosis of diabetes in the index twin but not thereafter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is likely that the changes are specific since: (1) the frequency of impaired glucose tolerance in twins who remain non-diabetic is high (11% ), considerably higher than could be expected for a normal population of this age (about 2%) [20] and (2) impaired glucose tolerance was only found in twins within five years of the diagnosis of the index twin. This clustering of changes in glucose tolerance around the time of diagnosis of the index twin suggests that the changes are not a nonspecific consequence of the potential variability in glucose tolerance [21]. Thus, some twins who remain non-diabetic showed both immune [19] and metabolic changes around the time of diagnosis of diabetes in the index twin but not thereafter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As required by the criteria of entry all the twins were within five years of the diagnosis of their index twin (median 7 months range 1 to 24). They were compared with seven control subjects of similar age (15.6 + 4.0 years; range 10-24), BMI (20.2 + 3.4 kg/m2; range [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and sex (four male). The remaining six twins are still not diabetic seven to 10 years from the diagnosis of the index twin; their mean age at testing was 16.9 + 3.9 years (range 14-24), BMI of 22.6 • 3.7 kg/m 2 (range 20-29), four were male.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One problem with IGT is the variability of the oral glucose tolerance test [2]. Subjects who have had IGT at one examination and have been retested within 3 months changed their classification status in up to 75 % of cases [3].…”
Section: Variability Of Igtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OGTT is subject to considerable intra-individual variation [18, [49][50][51] and fasting plasma glucose appears preferable to 2-h plasma glucose in this respect. In a recent study of Dutch adults, in which the OGTT was repeated during a 2-6-week interval, the intra-individual coefficients of variation were 6.4 % for fasting glucose and 16.7 % for the 2-h plasma glucose [51].…”
Section: Comparison Of Measures Of Hyperglycaemiamentioning
confidence: 99%