2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2013.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of vibration perception threshold values in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus and associated factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
12
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Autoimmunity status was not different in patients with and without neuropathy. Similar frequency of neuropathy (8.2%) was found in type 1 diabetes patients in SEARCH pilot study [33], although low reproducibility of vibration perception threshold values in young age was previously reported [34]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Autoimmunity status was not different in patients with and without neuropathy. Similar frequency of neuropathy (8.2%) was found in type 1 diabetes patients in SEARCH pilot study [33], although low reproducibility of vibration perception threshold values in young age was previously reported [34]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In this study, it is determined that height and age influence VPT in people with type 2 DM (Table 4). These results are consistent with previous studies [38][39][40][41]. It is known that age is the main determinant of VPT values, increasing VPT with age [22,36,42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, in people with DM, this is somewhat controversial. Some studies indicate that BMI does influence VPT values [38], but some do not [49]. Data obtained in this article cannot confirm whether this relationship applies to people with type 2 DM.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Interestingly, even children with toe-walking gait show different VPTs than controls, reflecting physiological changes in the localized receptors within the skin or at a neural perception level in these children [ 36 ]. In most of previous studies, the Biothesiometer has been used to detect vibrotactile perception, but again applied at non-tactile surfaces [ 12 , 28 , 37 ]. However, the gold standard is still electrophysiology, which is a more complicated method unsuitable for screening in clinical routine [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%