2022
DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2143217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducible changes in the anorexia nervosa gut microbiota following inpatient therapy remain distinct from non-eating disorder controls

Abstract: The composition of the gut microbiota in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN), and the ability of this microbial community to influence the host, remains uncertain. To achieve a broader understanding of the role of the intestinal microbiota in patients with AN, we collected fecal samples before and following clinical treatment at two geographically distinct eating disorder units (Center of Excellence for Eating Disorders [UNC-CH] and ACUTE Center for Eating Disorders [Denver Health]). Gut microbiotas were chara… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another limitation is that fecal concentrations of SCFA and microbiota taxonomy were not measured in combination with the plasma concentrations. In addition, we required a one-year duration of recovery from AN, which is consistent with many definitions of recovery but it may not be adequate for the normalization of the microbiota [67]. It is also possible that the dietary habits of the AN-REC group still differ from individuals without any history of an eating disorder [68] in ways that could influence the gut microbiota (e.g., the amount of ingested dietary fibers and resistant starch).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation is that fecal concentrations of SCFA and microbiota taxonomy were not measured in combination with the plasma concentrations. In addition, we required a one-year duration of recovery from AN, which is consistent with many definitions of recovery but it may not be adequate for the normalization of the microbiota [67]. It is also possible that the dietary habits of the AN-REC group still differ from individuals without any history of an eating disorder [68] in ways that could influence the gut microbiota (e.g., the amount of ingested dietary fibers and resistant starch).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Median BMI was 30.4 kg/m 2 (interquartile range [IQR] = 24.9-38.5 kg/m 2 ) among included participants and 17.3 kg/m 2 (IQR = 17.0-18.1 kg/m 2 ) among those excluded for a low BMI. Furthermore, individuals with a low BMI at the time of study participation may have been engaging in more restrictive eating disorder behaviors than those without a low BMI, which could impact the composition and diversity of the intestinal microbiota (42,43). These decisions align with the overarching objectives of the parent BEGIN study to extend genetic and microbiome research previously conducted in AN to individuals with BED and BN (37).…”
Section: Study Samplementioning
confidence: 92%
“…In patients with BMI < 13 enteral nutrition via NGT during the first 48 h. Initial enteral caloric intake 10 kcal/kg. Objective of caloric intake 30 kcal/kg/day 18 Yamazaki et al 2021 [ 47 ] 13.58 n.r n.r Expected weight gain 1 kg/week, usage of supplementary enteral nutrition 19 Smith et al 2021 [ 48 ] n.r n.r n.r n.r 20 Dauty et al [ 49 ] 13.80 1.00 n.r > 500 g per week , weight monitoring twice a week, NGT at entry > 1500 kcal × 36 gg approximately, dietary consultations once per week, supervised meals 21 Young et al [ 50 ] 12.70 n.r n.r n.r 22 Fouladi et al [ 51 ] 14.60 5.33 n.r 3200–3400 kcal at discharge 23 Funayama et al [ 52 ] 13.40 n.r n.r Mainly oral nutritional rehabilitation, intravenous feeding sometimes used, less frequently NGT. Initial caloric prescription 600–1400 kcal/day, increased by 200 kcal/day.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%