2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13007-017-0255-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducible genomic DNA preparation from diverse crop species for molecular genetic applications

Abstract: BackgroundSeveral high-throughput molecular genetic analyses rely on high-quality genomic DNA. Copurification of other molecules can negatively impact the functionality of plant DNA preparations employed in these procedures. Isolating DNA from agronomically important crops, such as sugarcane, rice, citrus, potato and tomato is a challenge due to the presence of high fiber, polysaccharides, or secondary metabolites. We present a simplified, rapid and reproducible SDS-based method that provides high-quality and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ DnA isolation and quantitative real-time pcR (qpcR). Leaf DNA was isolated according to Rezadoost and Chiong 37,38 with minor modifications as follow: leaf samples were finely chopped, and ~200 mg of leaf tissues was taken in 2 ml screw-cap microcentrifuge tubes 18 . The samples were homogenized for 45 s at 5000 rpm with the Precellys 24 homogenizer (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in the presence of two steel BB air gun beads (BB refers to the bead size, 4.5 mm-diameter) (Walmart Supercenter, Bentonville, AR, USA).…”
Section: Methods Plants Materialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ DnA isolation and quantitative real-time pcR (qpcR). Leaf DNA was isolated according to Rezadoost and Chiong 37,38 with minor modifications as follow: leaf samples were finely chopped, and ~200 mg of leaf tissues was taken in 2 ml screw-cap microcentrifuge tubes 18 . The samples were homogenized for 45 s at 5000 rpm with the Precellys 24 homogenizer (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in the presence of two steel BB air gun beads (BB refers to the bead size, 4.5 mm-diameter) (Walmart Supercenter, Bentonville, AR, USA).…”
Section: Methods Plants Materialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We verified the presence of the ShGPCR1 and bar (selectable marker) genes in co-transformed sugarcane plants by PCR using the forward primer (5'-GATGCTCACCCTGTTGTTTG-3') from the Ubi promoter and the reverse primer (5'-GACAGATCGAGCTCTGACTAGG-3') from the Tnos terminator. We performed PCR on a ProFlex™ PCR System in a total reaction volume of 25 μl using 100 ng of genomic DNA (isolated from 0.5-1 g of young leaves of 3-4-month-old plants using the protocol of Chiong et al, 2017), 0.1 μM of each target-specific primer, and 1.0 U of Taq DNA polymerase and ThermoPol™ buffer (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, United States). PCR conditions were as: one denaturing cycle at 95°C for 30 s, 30 cycles each at 95°C for 15 s, 52°C for 15 s, and 68°C for 1 min, and a final extension cycle at 68°C for 5 min.…”
Section: Sugarcane Transformation and Selection Of Transgenicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controls included vector-transformed lines and non-transformed plants (tissue culture-derived). Genomic DNA was isolated by grinding leaf tissues (3 g) collected from 3-to 4-month-old transgenic sugarcane plants in liquid nitrogen as previously reported (Tai and Tanksley, 1990;Chiong et al, 2017).…”
Section: Transgenic Plant Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%