Reproducing or dispersing? Using trait based habitat templet models to analyse Orthoptera response to flooding and land use

Dziock, Frank; Gerisch, Michael; Siegert, M. E.; Hering, Isabel; Scholz, Mathias; Ernst, Raffael

doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.07.015

Cited by 39 publications

(47 citation statements)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, this trait is proportional to body size and the phylogeny of the species (Dziock et al, 2011), and Ensifera species are usually placed in a higher reproductive category than Caelifera (see also our data in Appendix 1). Further, Ensifera species usually produce larger eggs and lay them individually in plants or under tree bark, behaviour which can increase the chance of hydrochory and thus their passive dispersal ability (Dziock et al, 2011). Therefore, Ensifera and Caelifera were used as examples of the differences in reproductive potential and passive dispersal of the species.…”

Section: Life-history Traitsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although the dispersal ability of species is important for the structuring of invertebrate assemblages in fl ooded habitats (Rothenbücher& Schaefer, 2006;Lambeets et al, 2009) before and after fl ooding (Rothenbücher & Schaefer, 2006), we did not fi nd any signifi cant effect of fl ooding on the different mobility trait groups. Instead of active dispersal, Dziock et al (2011) emphasize the importance of passive dispersal ability of orthopterans in fl oodplains. Certain orthopterans lay eggs in plants or under tree bark and their eggs can be transported together with their substrates by water.…”

Section: Effect Of Fl Oodingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To evaluate the degree of collinearity, Pearson correlation coeffi cients were computed between habitat variables (soil water content, vegetation height, the cover of vegetation at 10 and 40 cm above the ground, cover of litter, plant species richness) prior ian landscapes, fl ooding and land use pressure have a pronounced infl uence in shaping assemblages of Orthoptera (Dziock et al, 2011). The majority of species of Orthoptera are associated with open grassy habitats; therefore, for these species the amount of grassland in a landscape is important (Marini et al, 2008;Badenhausser & Cordeau, 2012).…”

Section: Data Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Effects of habitat and landscape features on grassland Orthoptera on floodplains in the lower reaches of the Tisza River Basin

Torma¹,

Bozsó²

2016

Eur. J. Entomol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Life-history Traitsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Effect Of Fl Oodingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Data Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effects of habitat and landscape features on grassland Orthoptera on floodplains in the lower reaches of the Tisza River Basin

Torma¹,

Bozsó²

2016

Eur. J. Entomol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Hence, we suppose that disturbances facilitate the spreading of species from the surrounding suitable habitats, e.g. grasslands (Albrecht et al 2010;Dziock et al 2011) and that these species can spread and cross also unsuitable habitats, e.g. closed canopy and dark forests (Kindvall 1999).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Orthoptera assemblages of beech stand plots during early succession stages after clearcutting -

Sliacka¹,

Krištín²,

Naďo³

2013

J. For. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Open habitats in closed forests are formed by various biotic and abiotic factors. These new habitats differ from their former parent stands in light conditions and vegetation structure facilitating their colonisation by heliophilous insects. We studied interseasonal differences (2010 and 2011) in the Orthoptera assemblages on eight clearcuts in beech forests. Using a sweeping method, altogether 20 species were recorded on the clearcuts in the first year, 26 in the second. In the second year, species number and abundance were higher in all orthopterans and also in the suborder of grasshoppers (Caelifera). In the crickets (Ensifera), interseasonal differences in the species number and abundance were not significant. The species composition differed among the plots also within individual years. In the second year, the frequency increased in 22 species (84.6%) while it decreased in four. We suggest that the grounddwelling Caelifera species are better bioindicators of the deforested plot colonisation than the arbusticolous Ensifera.

show abstract

“…Januschke et al, 2011). Flooding survival strategies differ in the different species (Dziock et al, 2011). Rothenbücher & Schaefer (2006) show that the majority of planthoppers and leafhoppers (70%) tolerate submersion and overwinter in flooded areas, whereas both spiders (63%) and carabids (73%), which are more mobile, move to safe areas.…”

Section: Adaptations To Floodingmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of disturbance caused by rivers flooding on ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)

Sienkiewicz¹,

Żmihorski²

2012

Eur. J. Entomol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract.We studied the effect of flooding on a carabid community inhabiting grassland in a large river valley (W Poland). We used pitfall-traps to catch beetles from April to November 1999-2001. Some of the samples collected were preceded by floods during the collecting period, which enabled us to evaluate the effects of flooding on species composition and abundance. We collected 17,722 individuals belonging to 108 species. The number of species and individuals per sample differed between plots and showed a nonlinear decrease over time, from spring to autumn. Carabids were more abundant in samples collected after floods than in the control samples. In contrast, the expected cumulative number of species as a function of the number of individuals collected was lower in samples collected after floods than in the control samples. In the case of the most abundant species the species-specific responses in terms of the numbers caught after flooding differed, with those of (e.g. Agonum micans) increasing and those of (Amara plebeja, Epaphius secalis) decreasing. This study shows that floods filter the community with the result that some species increase in abundance but the overall species richness decreases. Therefore natural floods are important in shaping the structure of communities of epigeic carabids on floodplains.

show abstract

Reproducing or dispersing? Using trait based habitat templet models to analyse Orthoptera response to flooding and land use

Cited by 39 publications

References 60 publications

Effects of habitat and landscape features on grassland Orthoptera on floodplains in the lower reaches of the Tisza River Basin

Effects of habitat and landscape features on grassland Orthoptera on floodplains in the lower reaches of the Tisza River Basin

Orthoptera assemblages of beech stand plots during early succession stages after clearcutting -

The effect of disturbance caused by rivers flooding on ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About