1997
DOI: 10.1006/bcon.1997.0520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproduction and Development ofOrius insidiosusin a Blue Light-Supplemented Short Photoperiod

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Orius insidiosus stock culture was initiated with insects purchased from a commercial supplier (Plant‐Prod Quebec, Laval, Quebec, Canada) and maintained in growth chambers. The rearing technique was adapted from Kiman and Yeargan9 and Stack and Drummond 10. The insects were maintained in 1 litre glass jars placed in growth chambers set at 22 (±2) °C, 65–75% relative humidity (RH) and a 16/8 h light/dark photoperiod.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orius insidiosus stock culture was initiated with insects purchased from a commercial supplier (Plant‐Prod Quebec, Laval, Quebec, Canada) and maintained in growth chambers. The rearing technique was adapted from Kiman and Yeargan9 and Stack and Drummond 10. The insects were maintained in 1 litre glass jars placed in growth chambers set at 22 (±2) °C, 65–75% relative humidity (RH) and a 16/8 h light/dark photoperiod.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rearing was adapted from Kinman and Yeargan12 and Stack and Drummond 13. This anthocorid was reared in 1‐litre glass jars placed in growth chambers set at 22 °C, 65–75% RH and 16:8 h light:dark photoperiod.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The artificial light environment is likely to influence behaviour related to activities such as orientation, host plant location, parasitism, predation and dispersion, as well as reproduction, development, survival and circadian and photoperiod rhythms in both pests and beneficial species (e.g. Stack & Drummond, 1997; Zilahi‐Balogh et al , 2006, 2007, 2009; Suzuki et al , 2007) in a species‐specific manner, depending on the visual capacity of the arthropod species, and the type of light technology and regime used. In this section, we review what is known about the effect of light on whiteflies and their natural enemies, with some additional examples from thrips, aphids and spider mites.…”
Section: Effect Of Light On Some Greenhouse Pest and Beneficial Arthrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The novel greenhouse lighting technologies also offer the possibility of improved management of pests and diseases (Schuerger & Brown, 1997; Rahman et al , 2003; Raviv & Antignus, 2004; Díaz & Fereres, 2007; Wang et al , 2010). So far, few studies have been specifically aimed at understanding how light affects the biology and behaviour of pests and beneficial arthropods in luminary lighted greenhouse crops (Wyatt & Brown, 1977; Shields, 1980; Stack & Drummond, 1997; Perdikis et al , 1999; Ruberson et al , 2000; Simmons et al , 2004; Gillespie & Quiring, 2005; Zilahi‐Balogh et al , 2006, 2007, 2009; Johansen, 2009). The effect of ultraviolet (UV)‐absorbing greenhouse coverings and mulches on arthropod behaviour has received more systematic attention (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%