2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproduction study using public data of: Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs

Abstract: We have attempted to reproduce the results in Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs , published in JAMA 2016; 316(22), using publicly available data sets. We re-implemented the main method in the original study since the source code is not available. The original study used non-public fundus images from EyePACS and three hospitals in India for training. We used a different EyePACS data set from Kaggle. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
121
0
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
121
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…It can detect subclinical and discrete features appearing below the threshold of a human observer and quantify minimal differences in feature expression. Recently, a CNN was trained on fundus images to screen DR [37][38][39][40][41][42] or age-related macular degeneration [43]. Moreover, a more sophisticated CNN (Google Inceptionv3) has been trained on datasets from the UK Biobank [44] and EyePACS [45] cohorts to detect cardiovascular risk factors from retinal images such as age, gender, hypertension, and smoking status [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can detect subclinical and discrete features appearing below the threshold of a human observer and quantify minimal differences in feature expression. Recently, a CNN was trained on fundus images to screen DR [37][38][39][40][41][42] or age-related macular degeneration [43]. Moreover, a more sophisticated CNN (Google Inceptionv3) has been trained on datasets from the UK Biobank [44] and EyePACS [45] cohorts to detect cardiovascular risk factors from retinal images such as age, gender, hypertension, and smoking status [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we achieved specificity and sensitivity as high as 89% and 98%, using a bi-classification grading scheme. Here we have shown [Table 7 & 8] that by tweaking the post processing of the outcome of a CNN, we have outperformed the previously published best performance of Kaggl EyePACS, which was later failed to be replicated(35).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Here we have shown [ Tables 7 & 8] that by adjusting the post processing of the outcome of a CNN, we have outperformed the previously published best performance of Kaggle EyePACS, which was later failed to be replicated [37].…”
Section: Sensitivity Upliftmentioning
confidence: 84%