2016
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2016.504.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive and Productive Indicators of Holstein-Friesian Cows Grown in Cubical Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Cilek (2009), the interval from calving for Holstein cows in Turkey were 111.6±3.7, somewhat less than those registered for the CPL cows in our study, but the DOP in the Turkish Holstein cows were higher at 149.6±4.4 than in our CPL group and lower than in the CON group. Popov et al (2016) found that DOP in first lactation was 141.6±13.3 and shorter in the third lactation at 126.7±15, similar to the median days open (123 days) in Iranian Holstein cows (Bahonar et al 2009), while in South Africa the average DOP in HF cows was 133.9 (Muller et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…According to Cilek (2009), the interval from calving for Holstein cows in Turkey were 111.6±3.7, somewhat less than those registered for the CPL cows in our study, but the DOP in the Turkish Holstein cows were higher at 149.6±4.4 than in our CPL group and lower than in the CON group. Popov et al (2016) found that DOP in first lactation was 141.6±13.3 and shorter in the third lactation at 126.7±15, similar to the median days open (123 days) in Iranian Holstein cows (Bahonar et al 2009), while in South Africa the average DOP in HF cows was 133.9 (Muller et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%