2019
DOI: 10.7755/fb.117.4.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive ecology and size-dependent fecundity in the petrale sole (Eopsetta jordani) in waters of California, Oregon, and Washington

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2018; Lefebvre et al. 2019). Fecundity scaling does not account for other reproductive attributes of large(r) females such as egg size or energy content, which can also have benefits for larval size and survival (Berkeley et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2018; Lefebvre et al. 2019). Fecundity scaling does not account for other reproductive attributes of large(r) females such as egg size or energy content, which can also have benefits for larval size and survival (Berkeley et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It emphasizes the importance of the largest females to the reproductive output of a population (Hixon et al 2014;Barneche et al 2018), although the scale of the impact on population reproductive output may only be ~10% when taking into account population demographics (Andersen et al 2019). The scaling of the fecundity and body size relationship has been found to vary, but nonisometric scaling with body size has been reported in a variety of fish taxa (Stafford et al 2014;Barneche et al 2018;Lefebvre et al 2019). Fecundity scaling does not account for other reproductive attributes of large(r) females such as egg size or energy content, which can also have benefits for larval size and survival (Berkeley et al 2004;Trippel and Neil 2004;Hixon et al 2014).…”
Section: Fecunditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virtual eggs were released within the spawning ground identified by the analysis above. Egg production in each year was calculated as the sum product of the annual number of females at length, the proportion mature at length (Stawitz et al, 2015), and the fecundity at length (Hannah et al, 2002;Lefebvre et al, 2019). Then egg production in each year was allocated to each spawning area using the proportion of the estimated biomass in each spawning polygon from VAST analysis above (Table 2).…”
Section: Inferring Petrale Sole Spawning Grounds and Egg Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%