1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6238(98)00023-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive function in relation to duty assignments among military personnel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Schrader S.M. et al did not confirm any differences in the quality of sperm between men exposed to radar, and those not exposed to its effect [24]. The discrepancies obtained by the researchers with respect to the problem of the potential hazardous effect of radar waves on reproduction may result from the construction differences between the appliances emitting these waves.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of the Effect Of Emrmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, Schrader S.M. et al did not confirm any differences in the quality of sperm between men exposed to radar, and those not exposed to its effect [24]. The discrepancies obtained by the researchers with respect to the problem of the potential hazardous effect of radar waves on reproduction may result from the construction differences between the appliances emitting these waves.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of the Effect Of Emrmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Sperm DNA damage has also been shown to have the lowest variability of all semen parameters examined, exhibiting a coefficient of variation of around !10% (Schrader et al 1988, Evenson et al 1991, although one study has recently reported it to be 29% (Erenpreiss et al 2006). Thus, many consider it to have potential as a more useful diagnostic tool in the clinical assessment of semen quality (Zini et al 2001, Loft et al 2003, Holt 2005.…”
Section: Assessment Of Nuclear and Mitochondrial Dnamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Lancranjan et al [1975] and Grajewski et al [2000] had similar findings. In contrast, both Hjollund and Bonde [1997] and Schrader et al [1998] found no such results. Differences in exposure type and exposure level might explain these differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Recent studies on the use of mobile phones also indicate a negative effect on sperm quality [Fejes et al, 2005;Kilgallon and Simmons, 2005;Erogul et al, 2006]. In contrast, some studies of this type show no effect on sperm quality [Schrader et al, 1998]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%