2017
DOI: 10.3386/w23768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive Health Care in Catholic-Owned Hospitals

Abstract: Declarations of interest: none. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, this paper adds to the literature on how provider ownership interacts with price incentives and regulation in healthcare Duggan (2000); Grabowski and Hirth (2003); Grabowski et al (2013); Clemens and Gottlieb (2014); Adelino et al (2015); Hill et al (2019); Curto et al (2019). 4 Some work points to non-pecuniary objectives of nonprofits as one reason nonprofit providers can outperform for-profits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, this paper adds to the literature on how provider ownership interacts with price incentives and regulation in healthcare Duggan (2000); Grabowski and Hirth (2003); Grabowski et al (2013); Clemens and Gottlieb (2014); Adelino et al (2015); Hill et al (2019); Curto et al (2019). 4 Some work points to non-pecuniary objectives of nonprofits as one reason nonprofit providers can outperform for-profits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association between unbundling and IPP LARC provision also likely differs by hospital-level factors, and quantifying that variation is critical to guide prioritization of technical assistance, education, and outreach resources to ensure equitable access to IPP LARC. Hospital-level factorsdincluding academic affiliation and Catholic statusdare highly associated with IPP LARC access, but have been understudied in the context of unbundling (Hill et al, 2017). Catholic health care institutions restrict contraceptive care provision among other reproductive services, which may impose a hard limit to the promise of Medicaid unbundling, especially in states with high saturation of Catholic facilities (Uttley & Khaikin, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the ERDs prohibit sterilization, patients delivering their children at faith-based hospitals are unable to request this additional postpartum procedure (Menegay et al 2022;Stulberg et al 2014). Indeed, mergers resulting in hospitals' switch to Catholic ownership were found to reduce rates of tubal ligation by 30% (Hill, Slusky, and Ginther 2019). This restriction particularly disadvantages women who have a family history of ovarian cancer, for whom opportunistic salpingectomies are the recommended cancer prevention strategy by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Committee on Gynecologic Practice 2019) and the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2013).…”
Section: Family Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faith-based hospitals, like those owned or affiliated with the Catholic Church or Seventh-Day Adventist Church, operate on religious doctrine that can prevent women, sexual minorities, and gender minorities from receiving evidence-based and doctor-informed care Hill, Slusky, and Ginther 2019;Kaye et al 2016;Stulberg et al 2010Stulberg et al , 2012Stulberg et al , 2014. Catholic 2 hospital systems impose the most severe faith-based restrictions on SRH because they operate under the Ethical and Religious Directives (ERDs) written by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (United States Conference of Catholic Bishops 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%