2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-23633-5_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive Impact of Environmental Chemicals on Animals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent assessment of global fish diversity ( Miranda et al, 2022 ) estimated that the number of recognised fish species is now over 36,000, of which about 20,000 are regarded as being under some level of threat. Significantly this assessment showed that freshwater fishes are more vulnerable than marine species to the impacts of pollution, much of which is attributable (among other reasons) to contamination from agriculture, mining effluents containing heavy metals, pesticides, chemicals involved in the manufacture of both plastics and cosmetics, as well as the release of human sewage with its content of endocrine disrupting chemicals ( Kanda, 2019 , Marlatt et al, 2022 ) and pharmaceuticals ( Sanderson et al, 2004 ). Many of these chemicals are known for their undesirable impacts on embryonic development in wild species and impaired reproductive functions, not only in fishes ( Tyler and Jobling, 2008 ), but also in birds, reptiles, amphibians and many marine crustaceans ( Beyer et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent assessment of global fish diversity ( Miranda et al, 2022 ) estimated that the number of recognised fish species is now over 36,000, of which about 20,000 are regarded as being under some level of threat. Significantly this assessment showed that freshwater fishes are more vulnerable than marine species to the impacts of pollution, much of which is attributable (among other reasons) to contamination from agriculture, mining effluents containing heavy metals, pesticides, chemicals involved in the manufacture of both plastics and cosmetics, as well as the release of human sewage with its content of endocrine disrupting chemicals ( Kanda, 2019 , Marlatt et al, 2022 ) and pharmaceuticals ( Sanderson et al, 2004 ). Many of these chemicals are known for their undesirable impacts on embryonic development in wild species and impaired reproductive functions, not only in fishes ( Tyler and Jobling, 2008 ), but also in birds, reptiles, amphibians and many marine crustaceans ( Beyer et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may remain in the soil up to 4 years and might be washed to rivers or leached to groundwater where it degrades slowly (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2007). There are various reports of the effects of EDCs on wildlife, especially in freshwater ecosystems, such as abnormal development and death of embryos (Arukwe et al 2016;Ortiz-Villanueva et al 2018), changes in sexual behaviour (Kanda 2019), feminization of male animals (Carnevali et al 2018) and altered immune functions (Nowak et al 2019). The effects of EDCs had also been recorded in birds, especially those feeding in polluted waters (Roman et al 2019;Jessl et al 2018) and may ultimately lead to loss of biodiversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The driving aim of this work was to investigate whether features or morphology/physiology in adult frogs could predict reproductive outcomes in those frogs, including under exposure conditions. Anti-androgenic chemicals are particularly relevant for effects on male reproductive success [34] and are commonly found to induce effects at environmentally relevant concentrations [35]. In this work we were seeking to identify features associated with male reproductive success in a laboratory model species as a first step towards the development of reliable biomarker(s) of reproductive health with potential for application to wild anurans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%