1994
DOI: 10.1006/bojl.1994.1050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive isolation mechanisms among four closely-related species of Conospermum (Proteaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to other observations on eastern Australian species C. taxifolium, C. ericifolium, C. ellipticum and C. longifolium where no self-pollination occurred when pollinators were excluded (Morrison et al 1994). The genetic analysis for C. eatoniae showed that fertilisation with self-pollen did occur at the field station.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is similar to other observations on eastern Australian species C. taxifolium, C. ericifolium, C. ellipticum and C. longifolium where no self-pollination occurred when pollinators were excluded (Morrison et al 1994). The genetic analysis for C. eatoniae showed that fertilisation with self-pollen did occur at the field station.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This causes the anthers to dehisce explosively, releasing the pollen in a single dusty mass. The moist cup-shaped stigma is forced down onto the pollinator and picks up pollen carried by the insect (Carolin 1961;Morrison et al 1994;Bennett 1995a). Houston (1989) identified a distinct species-group of small bees (5-9 mm long) that were collected only from white-flowered Conospermum.…”
Section: Study Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, many genera of Proteaceae exhibit self-incompatibility systems and evidence of selective fruit development (Goldingay & Carthew, 1998;Vaughton & Carthew, 1993). Accordingly, C. undulatum is considered to be a self-incompatible species (Goldingay & Carthew, 1998;Morrison, McDonald, Bankoff, & Quirico, 1994), and this would reduce the reproductive assurance of geitonogamy, especially in small fragments. However, the reproductive biology of this species has not been studied in detail as yet, and there is a need to understand the reproductive responses of this rare plant in a highly fragmented landscape to inform future conservation efforts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%