1999
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/10.5.510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive parasitism of broodcare helpers in a cooperatively breeding fish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
141
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
141
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the cooperative behaviour experimentally elicited in this study is of crucial importance for a test of the pay-to-stay hypothesis, as alloparental egg-care does not provide immediate fitness benefits to unrelated helpers, whereas it involves clear costs 36,37 . As this helping effort is hence altruistic, it can be selected for only if helpers receive other fitness benefits in return, which result from the tolerance in a safe territory that provides them with access to vital resources such as shelter and protection 19,29,48 , and opportunities to share in reproduction 49,50 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the cooperative behaviour experimentally elicited in this study is of crucial importance for a test of the pay-to-stay hypothesis, as alloparental egg-care does not provide immediate fitness benefits to unrelated helpers, whereas it involves clear costs 36,37 . As this helping effort is hence altruistic, it can be selected for only if helpers receive other fitness benefits in return, which result from the tolerance in a safe territory that provides them with access to vital resources such as shelter and protection 19,29,48 , and opportunities to share in reproduction 49,50 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because social strategies could have a major influence on reproductive success, as subordinates will try to combine mating success with avoidance of eviction from the group as a consequence of their mating attempts. Such a situation exists in the cichlid fish species with helpers and in the extended family groups of N. multifasciatus, and the functional aspects of these conflicts are well studied (Taborsky 1984(Taborsky , 1985Dierkes et al 1999). Subordinates' frequent submissive behaviours towards high-ranking group members (Kohler 1997) could be seen as a behavioural adaptation to manipulate the decisions of group members.…”
Section: Living In Individualised Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male helpers may share paternity with the breeder male (Dierkes et al, 1999), and Oliveira et al (2003) reported similar levels of testosterone (T) and 11-ketotestosterone (11-KT) in both breeder males and helper males in this species. Thus, in N. pulcher, there is a potential for conflict between helpers and breeders about the possible participation of helpers in reproduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, in N. pulcher, there is a potential for conflict between helpers and breeders about the possible participation of helpers in reproduction. Breeder males threaten helpers with aggression and the risk of expulsion (Dierkes et al, 1999;Skubic et al, 2004), while helpers attempt to appease the breeders and reduce the risk of expulsion from the territory by helping and displaying submissive behaviour, depending on environmental constraints (Taborsky, 1985;Balshine-Earn et al, 1998;Heg et al, 2004a;. Buchner et al (2004) found higher cortisol (F) plasma levels in dominant individuals than in subordinates in N. pulcher, confirming a general rule found in many mammal and bird societies, where paternity is shared by dominants and subordinates and the social situation is therefore stressful for the dominants (Schoech et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation