2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-018-2521-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive performance of a tropical apex predator in an unpredictable habitat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our estimates of peak reproductive output in Steller sea lions in Southeast Alaska were moderately high compared to those for other otariids. Our estimates were similar to published estimates for subantarctic fur seals, Arctocephalus tropicalis, on Amsterdam Island (0.721 at age 12;Dabin et al, 2004) and New Zealand fur seals, Arctocephalus forsteri, at Kangaroo Island (0.60-0.70 at age 8+;McKenzieet al, 2007), and much higher than the endangered Galapagos sea lion, Zalophus wollebaeki (0.40-0.48 at ages 6+;Kalberer et al, 2018). In contrast, our estimates at peak ages were lower than published estimates for the California sea lion, Zalophus californianus (0.77-0.80;Hernández-Camacho et al, 2008;Melin et al, 2012), the endangered New Zealand Sea Lion, Phocarctos hookeri (~0.75 to 0.88 at age 7+;Childerhouse et al, 2010) and the Antarctic fur seal, Arctocephalus gazella (0.80 at ages 7-9 at Bird Island;Lunn et al, 1994; 0.90 at ages 8-16 at Livingston Island;Schwarz et al, 2013).Although the combined survival probabilities and reproductive output was sufficient for population stability or growth in SoutheastF I G U R E 5 Annual variation in the proportion of female Steller sea lions (a) With-Pup or (b) With-Juvenile in Southeast Alaska, 2005-2019.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our estimates of peak reproductive output in Steller sea lions in Southeast Alaska were moderately high compared to those for other otariids. Our estimates were similar to published estimates for subantarctic fur seals, Arctocephalus tropicalis, on Amsterdam Island (0.721 at age 12;Dabin et al, 2004) and New Zealand fur seals, Arctocephalus forsteri, at Kangaroo Island (0.60-0.70 at age 8+;McKenzieet al, 2007), and much higher than the endangered Galapagos sea lion, Zalophus wollebaeki (0.40-0.48 at ages 6+;Kalberer et al, 2018). In contrast, our estimates at peak ages were lower than published estimates for the California sea lion, Zalophus californianus (0.77-0.80;Hernández-Camacho et al, 2008;Melin et al, 2012), the endangered New Zealand Sea Lion, Phocarctos hookeri (~0.75 to 0.88 at age 7+;Childerhouse et al, 2010) and the Antarctic fur seal, Arctocephalus gazella (0.80 at ages 7-9 at Bird Island;Lunn et al, 1994; 0.90 at ages 8-16 at Livingston Island;Schwarz et al, 2013).Although the combined survival probabilities and reproductive output was sufficient for population stability or growth in SoutheastF I G U R E 5 Annual variation in the proportion of female Steller sea lions (a) With-Pup or (b) With-Juvenile in Southeast Alaska, 2005-2019.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Since 2012, counts have followed a standardized method based on the management plan for Galapagos sea lion’s conservation 29 . As animal counts for 2018 remain close to that recorded in 2001 and that the average age of reproducing individuals is ~ 10 years with a typical lifespan ≥ of 18 years 47 , the population may have been relatively stable over the past 20 years. If so, this suggests that a population reduction of 50% is maintained in the last four generations (1978–2018), which would ratify its classification as an endangered species 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The northern region is characterized by having a slight influence of the South Equatorial Current and Panama Bight Cyclonic Gyre that causes a low marine production 32 , while the central region is considered a mixing area 33 . Both conditions limit the resilience of GSL females since after anomalous oceanographic events (such as El Niño) they usually need between one and two years to regain their reproductive synchrony 47 , 72 . While the upwellings of the western region 33 , and the greater abundance of females in the southeast region 10 could compensate or facilitate the generation of new cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pattern was seen regardless of individual differences in background energy expenditures (Figure 4). Previous work has demonstrated that female seals may adjust their reproductive output between years, when faced with changing environmental conditions prior to the lactation period, in order to maximize lifetime reproductive output (Bowen et al, 2015; Desprez et al., 2018; Kalberer, Meise, Trillmich, & Krüger, 2018; McMahon et al., 2016; Pomeroy et al., 1999; Smout et al., 2020), but research has yet to reveal the mechanism for terminating lactation in grey seals (e.g. by investigating metabolite trends leading up to weaning; Mellish & Iverson, 2001; Watson, Pomeroy, Al‐Tannak, & Kennedy, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%