2020
DOI: 10.6000/1927-520x.2019.08.03.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive Performance of Water Buffalo Cows: A Review of Affecting Factors

Abstract: This article aims to review both the economic impact of reproductive failures on the profitability of water buffalo systems and the effect of different factors on the reproductive performance of water buffaloes. Besides, an overview of various non-hormonal alternatives to improve reproductive performance is made. The optimal reproductive efficiency in water buffaloes implies calving to conception interval around 90 days to reach a calving interval of 400 days, with longer calving intervals having a negative im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
(244 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the major factors negatively influencing the success of IVEP in domestic buffalo is the limited biological material, but our results suggest that IVEP could be an effective tool for conservation and propagation of valuable germplasm in the African buffalo. The slight decline in COC numbers during aging has been seen in several related species including cattle and water buffalo (Katska 1984, Nava‐Trujillo 2020). In cattle, the number of COCs declined from 9.88 ± 6.24 in juvenile animals to 8.37 ± 5.87 in adults (Ka̧tska 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…One of the major factors negatively influencing the success of IVEP in domestic buffalo is the limited biological material, but our results suggest that IVEP could be an effective tool for conservation and propagation of valuable germplasm in the African buffalo. The slight decline in COC numbers during aging has been seen in several related species including cattle and water buffalo (Katska 1984, Nava‐Trujillo 2020). In cattle, the number of COCs declined from 9.88 ± 6.24 in juvenile animals to 8.37 ± 5.87 in adults (Ka̧tska 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A low reproductive performance implies greater costs by feeding and medicines, more nonproductive days, decreased milk yield, less economic return for commercializing nonpregnant buffaloes, decreased number of replacements, males to sale, and sale of potentially productive animals (Shah et al, 1991; Cicek et al, 2017; Khan et al, 2008; Ribeiro et al, 2012; Safari et al, 2019. In this scenario, achieve the goal of getting the buffaloes pregnant ≤ 90 days postpartum is a priority, although it can be challenging because several factors affect the reproductive performance of buffaloes (NavaTrujillo et al, 2020b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%