2009
DOI: 10.3354/meps07741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive periodicity, localised movements and behavioural segregation of pregnant Carcharias taurus at Wolf Rock, southeast Queensland, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
73
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(49 reference statements)
4
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, male sharks .2 m L t were considered mature, 1.5-2 m L t as subadults and those ,1.5 m L t as juvenile. The size (L t ) of individual sharks was estimated by eye for all four PID surveys and through subsequent analysis of high-resolution images, including those of sharks measured using laser photogrammetry (Bansemer and Bennett 2009;Rohner et al 2011). Accuracy of measurements was assessed to be about AE5%.…”
Section: Photographic-identification (Pid) Surveys and Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Likewise, male sharks .2 m L t were considered mature, 1.5-2 m L t as subadults and those ,1.5 m L t as juvenile. The size (L t ) of individual sharks was estimated by eye for all four PID surveys and through subsequent analysis of high-resolution images, including those of sharks measured using laser photogrammetry (Bansemer and Bennett 2009;Rohner et al 2011). Accuracy of measurements was assessed to be about AE5%.…”
Section: Photographic-identification (Pid) Surveys and Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many female sharks bore mating scars or were obviously pregnant, characterised by markedly distended flanks. However, external recognition of pregnancy was first noticeable from late February (Bansemer and Bennett 2009). To describe the distribution of pregnant and non-pregnant sharks, all individuals seen with mating scars only, seen with mating scars and subsequently observed to be pregnant, or only seen when pregnant were included as 'pregnant sharks'.…”
Section: Photographic-identification (Pid) Surveys and Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Knowledge on their population dynamics is often limited due to a lack of information on their habitat use within the geographical areas they occupy and traverse (Stevens 2010). For such species, predictable aggregations at specific sites provide unique opportunities to assess population sizes, distribution patterns and, potentially, movement patterns of these otherwise elusive fishes (e.g., Dudgeon et al 2008;Bansemer and Bennett 2009;Holmberg et al 2009). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%