2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-007-0879-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive plasticity in mole crabs, Emerita brasiliensis, in sandy beaches with contrasting morphodynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the population level, the Habitat Harshness Hypothesis (HHH: Defeo et al 2003) predicts that the harsh environment in reflective beaches forces organisms to invest more energy in maintenance than in reproduction and growth, result-ing in lower abundance, fecundity, growth and survival rates than in dissipative beaches. In agreement with SEH and HHH predictions, studies conducted worldwide have shown a consistent decrease in community (McLachlan 1990, Defeo et al 1992, McLachlan et al 1993, Jaramillo et al 2000, Soares 2003, Rodil & Lastra 2004, McLachlan & Dorvlo 2005 and population (truly intertidal species: Nel et al 2001, de la Huz et al 2002, Contreras et al 2003, Celentano & Defeo 2006, Delgado & Defeo 2008, Thompson & Sánchez De Bock 2009 indicators from dissipative to reflective beaches (but see Herrmann 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…At the population level, the Habitat Harshness Hypothesis (HHH: Defeo et al 2003) predicts that the harsh environment in reflective beaches forces organisms to invest more energy in maintenance than in reproduction and growth, result-ing in lower abundance, fecundity, growth and survival rates than in dissipative beaches. In agreement with SEH and HHH predictions, studies conducted worldwide have shown a consistent decrease in community (McLachlan 1990, Defeo et al 1992, McLachlan et al 1993, Jaramillo et al 2000, Soares 2003, Rodil & Lastra 2004, McLachlan & Dorvlo 2005 and population (truly intertidal species: Nel et al 2001, de la Huz et al 2002, Contreras et al 2003, Celentano & Defeo 2006, Delgado & Defeo 2008, Thompson & Sánchez De Bock 2009 indicators from dissipative to reflective beaches (but see Herrmann 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Delgado & Defeo (2008) reported a M : F ratio of 1.35 : 1, while Osorio et al (1967) found a much more balanced proportion in the case of E. analoga (1.05 : 1). These results contrast with data provided for E. emeritus by Boonruang & Phasuk (1975) who found a sex proportion clearly in favour of females (0.2287 : 1, i.e., over 4 females for each male), a situation which we also observed with E. rathbunae (M : F, 1 : 1.5) although not as strongly marked as in the Asiatic species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…According to Efford (1967), in Emerita difference in length between sexes is related to neoteny in males, for its earliness in the process of sexual maturation. It should be added that several authors (e.g., Subramoniam, 1977;Delgado & Defeo, 2006) indicate that Emerita may have a degree of hermaphroditism in which males go through an intersexual state before becoming females (protandrous hermaphrodites) and continue to grow (Lacadena, 1998), which justifies the difference in the maximum length observed between sexes as there is a clear limit of the potential maximum size reached by males.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in temporally and spatially variable environments such as estuaries, small-scale heterogeneity in those factors may therefore contribute to intraspecific variability in egg characteristics, causing intra-and inter-populational variation in embryonic quality. There are many studies related to differences in size and biochemical composition of crustacean eggs comparing geographically separated populations (Jones and Simons, 1983;Wehrtmann and kattner, 1998;lardies and Castilla, 2001;lardies and Wehrtmann, 2001;Bas et al, 2007, delgado anddefeo, 2008), whereas comparative studies between contrasting habitats of the same population are less commonly found in the scientific literature. This aspect of intraspecific variability is addressed in the present study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%