2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.10.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive responses to photoperiod persist in olfactory bulbectomized Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus)

Abstract: In reproductively photoperiodic Syrian hamsters, removal of the olfactory bulbs leads to a marked and sustained increase in gonadotrophin secretion which prevents normal testicular regression in short photoperiods. In contrast, among reproductively non-photoperiodic laboratory strains of rats and mice, bulbectomy unmasks reproductive responses to photoperiod. The role of the olfactory bulbs has been proposed to have opposite effects on responsiveness to photoperiod, depending on the photoperiodicity of the rep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hamsters were weighed (±0.1 g) weekly, and estimated testis volumes (ETVs) were determined at two-week intervals under light isoflurane anesthesia. In this experiment, reproductive neuroendocrine responses to photoperiod (testis sizes, plasma testosterone and FSH concentrations) in OBx hamsters were comparable to those of sham-operated hamsters and have been reported elsewhere (Prendergast et al, 2008b). …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hamsters were weighed (±0.1 g) weekly, and estimated testis volumes (ETVs) were determined at two-week intervals under light isoflurane anesthesia. In this experiment, reproductive neuroendocrine responses to photoperiod (testis sizes, plasma testosterone and FSH concentrations) in OBx hamsters were comparable to those of sham-operated hamsters and have been reported elsewhere (Prendergast et al, 2008b). …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Gonadal responses to photoperiod are capable of substantial immunomodulatory effects in this species (Prendergast et al, 2008a), but a recent report from our laboratory indicates that the Siberian hamster OB is entirely unnecessary for normal photoperiodic regulation of the reproductive system (Prendergast et al, 2008b). Entrainment of the circadian system to long and short days (and presumably, the downstream generation of photoperiod-specific nightly melatonin signals) is likewise comparable among OBx and intact hamsters, eliminating differences in entrainment as a potential mechanistic explanation for the modest effects of OBx observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Changes in photoperiod are consistent between years and therefore photoperiod is an ideal environmental cue to time reproductive activity in many mammals (Bradshaw and Holzapfel, 2007). In most temperate rodents, short-day photoperiods (SD) induce the regression of the reproductive organs and inhibit reproduction, whereas long-day photoperiods (LD) cause reproductive recrudescence (Hegstrom and Breedlove, 1999;Prendergast et al, 2009;Trainor et al, 2006). In the tropics and sub-tropics where photoperiodic changes are much less pronounced, both reproductively photoperiodic and non-photoperiodic mammals have been identified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Olfactory input is necessary for normal photoperiodic responses in gray mouse lemurs [40] and Syrian hamsters [41][42], potentially due to OBX-dependent increases in gonadotropins. However, OBX in Siberian hamsters has no affect on photoperiodic responses [43]. Thus, the exact role of olfaction and the olfactory bulbs in photoperiodic responses is species-specific, and in white-footed mice remains uninvestigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%