Reproductive Results in Cancer Survivors after Fertility Sparing Management: The Need for the Standardization of Definitions

Abstract

In fertility-sparing management (FSM), two different issues can be distinguished: the risk of recurrence/death and the chance of childbearing. Survival is the principal outcome in oncology, and definitions of overall survival and progression-free survival are therefore well defined and widely accepted. The introduction of FSM to clinical practice was determined by the desire of young cancer patients to still have children. Initially, in small groups of patients, any pregnancy and/or childbirth were considered successes. Nowadays, FSM occupies an important place in cancer treatment, with thousands of young women treated successfully. However, in contrast to survival, no definition has been established for evaluating the reproductive outcomes of FSM. This review article evaluates the current pregnancy and birth rates of cancer patients. Differences between fertility-sparing and conservative treatment are analyzed, and improper and confusing interchangeable applications of these terms are pointed out. Additionally, various reasons for choosing FSM as a treatment method—which are not directly related to fertility preservation (treatment mismatch)—are presented. Uniform definitions of reproduction after FSM should be established to enable the comparison of results and facilitate the counseling of patients regarding the chances of reproduction.

Obstetric Results after Fertility-Sparing Management of Non-Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

“…All of the women maintained menstruation and 79.5% of those who desired pregnancy (25 out of 44) delivered infants without congenital anomalies. We believe that the retrospective evaluation of the desire to be pregnant may cause some bias [ 31 ] and, for this reason, we presented the pregnancy rate of the entire fertility sparing subset of patients, which in our opinion seems to be a more appropriate demonstration of the data.…”