2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive strategies and relationship preferences associated with prestigious and dominant men

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern suggests that affiliative humour may be a cue to good long-term partner characteristics, as we hypothesised, and Study 2 demonstrated that affiliative humour was associated with cooperativeness. The results therefore support the assertion that the attractiveness of humour styles may follow the same pattern established by KRUGER and FITZGERALD (2011) that dominance and cooperativeness (or potentially prestige) are differentially preferred.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This pattern suggests that affiliative humour may be a cue to good long-term partner characteristics, as we hypothesised, and Study 2 demonstrated that affiliative humour was associated with cooperativeness. The results therefore support the assertion that the attractiveness of humour styles may follow the same pattern established by KRUGER and FITZGERALD (2011) that dominance and cooperativeness (or potentially prestige) are differentially preferred.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…KRUGER and FITZGERALD (2011) found that dominant personality traits (not including sense of humour) are mainly attractive for short-term relationships. The same study also found that men high in prestigiousness were more attractive for long-term relationships, suggesting men higher in socially desirable traits, such as affiliation and cooperativeness, are considered better partners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, under conditions of uncertainty, it is likely that additional desires to affiliate are aroused (Murray et al, 2006) that can lead to more behavioral attraction toward those who are seen as likely to accept him/her. This pattern might best be understood by considering evolutionary explanations for why women engage in one-night stands (with someone they might meet at a discotheque), encounters in which the possible benefits (in the form of a quality genetic contribution) outweigh the costs of potentially raising a child alone (e.g., Kruger & Fitzgerald, 2011). Put another way, affiliation with another person about whom one is uncertain is more risky and should only be pursued when the possible benefits are great.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In modern humans in industrialized societies, women at peak fertility in their menstrual cycle are more attracted to charismatic, dominant men (Durante et al, 2012). Men often over-estimate preference by women for male-dominated relationships (Kruger and Fitzgerald, 2011). Men who use short-term mating strategies are more likely to be considered physically attractive and socially dominant but lack traits associated with long-term partnership and fatherhood (Kruger and Fitzgerald, 2011; Durante et al, 2012).…”
Section: Changes and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Men often over-estimate preference by women for male-dominated relationships (Kruger and Fitzgerald, 2011). Men who use short-term mating strategies are more likely to be considered physically attractive and socially dominant but lack traits associated with long-term partnership and fatherhood (Kruger and Fitzgerald, 2011; Durante et al, 2012). Men who use long-term mating strategies tend to be less dominant, charismatic, and physically attractive but possess traits associated with long-term partnership and parenting (Kruger and Fitzgerald, 2011; Durante et al, 2012).…”
Section: Changes and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%