1991
DOI: 10.1021/ma00011a039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reptation and constraint release in linear polymer melts: an experimental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

12
57
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
12
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Friction coefficients in the two descriptions are derived from the solution of the memory functions, while the rescaling of the simulation time is obtained from the entropic contribution, which accounts for the intramolecular degrees of freedom neglected in the soft-colloid representation. Theoretical predictions compare well against UA MD simulations [14,[45][46][47] and experiments [39,[48][49][50][51]. We also calculate the diffusion coefficient for new polyethylene (PE) samples in thermodynamics conditions for which UA MD data are not available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Friction coefficients in the two descriptions are derived from the solution of the memory functions, while the rescaling of the simulation time is obtained from the entropic contribution, which accounts for the intramolecular degrees of freedom neglected in the soft-colloid representation. Theoretical predictions compare well against UA MD simulations [14,[45][46][47] and experiments [39,[48][49][50][51]. We also calculate the diffusion coefficient for new polyethylene (PE) samples in thermodynamics conditions for which UA MD data are not available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…We selected UA MD simulations as our test (Table I) because they have been shown to reproduce with a high level of accuracy the dynamical properties of PE melts, such as diffusion and viscosity [71,72]. We also compared predictions of rescaled MS-MD simulations with experiments for samples with temperature T = 509 K, monomer site density ρ = 0.0315302 sites/Å 3 , and N = 36, 72, 106, 130, 143, 192, and 242 [39,[48][49][50][51]. Our MS-MD simulations, properly rescaled, provided good quantitative predictions of the diffusion coefficient for those systems [31].…”
Section: Mesoscale Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase of d and the decrease of D for probe chains in a high-M matrix can result only from the suppression of mutual chain relaxation effects, while fluctuations remain intact. Since significantly lower scaling exponents than expected are observed for probe systems [28,[31][32][33], the influence of surrounding chains motion has to be higher than usually accepted and the influence of fluctuations less [8][9][10]. However, considering that the deviations from ideal reptation exponents (about 0.3-0.4) and the Z crossover positions (about 100) are similar for both rheology and diffusion, it is possible to preserve the 0 D s Z scaling proposed by Lodge [6,29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Since tracer diffusion results from the diffusion of a probe chain in a high-M matrix, the two environments for D tr and D s are exactly the same as those in our rheological tests. Lodge [6] has collected extensive literature data on self-diffusion of entangled hydrogenated PBD [26 -30], and Wang [31] has further taken into account additional tracer diffusion data [28,32]. Interestingly, the two authors have reached very different conclusions from almost the same set of selfdiffusion data (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are measurements of the shear viscosity 9,10 or plateau modulus, 3 both by means of rheometry, and measurements of self-diffusion coefficients, e.g., by means of NMR field-gradient diffusometry, 9,10 forward recoil spectroscopy, 11 or scanning infrared microscopy. 12 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%