2011
DOI: 10.3354/dao02409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reptiles as potential vectors and hosts of the amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in Panama

Abstract: Chytridiomycosis, the disease caused by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, is considered to be a disease exclusively of amphibians. However, B. dendrobatidis may also be capable of persisting in the environment, and non-amphibian vectors or hosts may contribute to disease transmission. Reptiles living in close proximity to amphibians and sharing similar ecological traits could serve as vectors or reservoir hosts for B. dendrobatidis, harbouring the organism on their skin without succumbing to disease. We surveyed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of rates of physical contact between frogs on rates of transmission of B. dendrobatidis are not known, but frogs can also become infected by contact with water or substrates, both of which can harbour infectious B. dendrobatidis zoospores [48,49]. In addition, zoospores can be carried and released into the environment by non-amphibian hosts, including nematodes and crayfish [50,51], and non-amphibian reservoirs, including reptiles and waterfowl [52,53]. Increased calling effort could also attract predators [54], which would be detrimental for pathogen transmission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of rates of physical contact between frogs on rates of transmission of B. dendrobatidis are not known, but frogs can also become infected by contact with water or substrates, both of which can harbour infectious B. dendrobatidis zoospores [48,49]. In addition, zoospores can be carried and released into the environment by non-amphibian hosts, including nematodes and crayfish [50,51], and non-amphibian reservoirs, including reptiles and waterfowl [52,53]. Increased calling effort could also attract predators [54], which would be detrimental for pathogen transmission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this idea appeared to be temporarily abandoned after Rowley et al (17) retracted their initial report of the detection of B. dendrobatidis on nonamphibian hosts (18). Recently, it was reported that B. dendrobatidis can be carried on algae (12), terrestrial reptiles (19), waterfowl (20), and nematodes (21), but there is currently no evidence that these carriers actually supported pathogen growth or transmission, which would be necessary to explain the long-term persistence of B. dendrobatidis in the absence of amphibians. Other studies have grown B. dendrobatidis on boiled snake skin (11,22), sterilized bird feathers (23), and toe scales from waterfowl (20), but none of these studies demonstrated B. dendrobatidis growth on live hosts with functioning immune systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Dis Aquat Org 112: [229][230][231][232][233][234][235] 2015 Anolis lizards (Kilburn et al 2011), 3 species of snake (Kilburn et al 2011), Caenorhabditis elegans nematodes (under laboratory conditions, Shapard et al 2012), and wading birds (Garmyn et al 2012). However, none of these studies have demonstrated the ability of the pathogen to complete its life cycle on or in these non-amphibian taxa.…”
Section: Resale or Republication Not Permitted Without Written Consenmentioning
confidence: 99%