2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.82.044612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repulsive nature of optical potentials for high-energy heavy-ion scattering

Abstract: The recent works by the present authors predicted that the real part of heavy-ion optical potentials changes its character from attraction to repulsion around the incident energy per nucleon E/A = 200-300 MeV on the basis of the complex G-matrix interaction and the double-folding model (DFM) and revealed that the three-body force plays an important role there. In the present paper, we have precisely analyzed the energy dependence of the calculated DFM potentials and its relation to the elastic-scattering angul… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
50
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
9
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase of the RMS radii by the deformation is only 4 − 6%, but it is quite important that such a small effect is detectable in the experimental data. Owing to this effect, the calculated reaction cross sections reproduce the data for [28][29][30]32 Ne. For 31 Ne, however, the present results still underestimate the measured cross sections.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase of the RMS radii by the deformation is only 4 − 6%, but it is quite important that such a small effect is detectable in the experimental data. Owing to this effect, the calculated reaction cross sections reproduce the data for [28][29][30]32 Ne. For 31 Ne, however, the present results still underestimate the measured cross sections.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…It is very likely that the deformed WS model has almost a same amount of σ R reduction. After this reduction, the calculated cross sections agrees with the data for [28][29][30]32 Ne, but underestimates the data by 32 ± 22 mb for 31 Ne. Thus, the theoretical results are consistent with the data for 30 Ne but not for 31 Ne, because the difference of σ R between the two nuclei is smaller in the model calculation than in the data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In the folding model, the optical potential is obtained by folding the g-matrix [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] with the target density ρ T for NA scattering and with ρ T and the projectile one ρ P for AA scattering; see for example Refs. [15][16][17][18][19] for the folding procedure. The model is now called the single-folding (SF) model for NA scattering and the double-folding (DF) model for AA scattering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the folding model with the Melbourne g matrix [26] The potential is composed of the direct and exchange parts, U DR and U EX [41,42]:…”
Section: A Folding Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%