2021
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abd2605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repurposing RNA sequencing for discovery of RNA modifications in clinical cohorts

Abstract: The study of RNA modifications in large clinical cohorts can reveal relationships between the epitranscriptome and human diseases, although this is especially challenging. We developed ModTect (https://github.com/ktan8/ModTect), a statistical framework to identify RNA modifications de novo by standard RNA-sequencing with deletion and mis-incorporation signals. We show that ModTect can identify both known (N1-methyladenosine) and previously unknown types of mRNA modifications (N2,N2-dimethylguanosine) at nucleo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The U1248 position of 18S is known to be m 1 acp 3 Ψ modified and is located within the ribosome decoding region ( Meyer et al, 2011 ). The U4530 position of 28S is known to be m 3 U modified ( Tan et al, 2021 ). These three rRF modification sites were detected with high mismatch by TGIRT ( Figure 5 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The U1248 position of 18S is known to be m 1 acp 3 Ψ modified and is located within the ribosome decoding region ( Meyer et al, 2011 ). The U4530 position of 28S is known to be m 3 U modified ( Tan et al, 2021 ). These three rRF modification sites were detected with high mismatch by TGIRT ( Figure 5 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three rRF modification sites were detected with high mismatch by TGIRT ( Figure 5 ). Interestingly, 18S:1248 (m 1 acp 3 Ψ) was suggested to have a lower modification level based on mismatch pattern from long RNA-seq in TCGA tumors, especially READ, UCEC and COAD ( Tan et al, 2021 ). Surprisingly, although rRNA modifications on human ribosomes have very recently been visualized by Cryo-EM ( Natchiar et al, 2017 ), a lot of the rRNA modification enzymatic processes are not well elucidated in humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers should apply various approaches to avoid making an incorrect assumption about a specific nucleotide and its potential modifications. Machine learning approaches have been developed to infer RNA modifications from RNA sequencing data, with varying success (Ryvkin et al 2013;Tan et al 2021;Werner et al 2020).…”
Section: Modification-induced Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is well documented that people with cancer, obesity and diabetes are more vulnerable to COVID-19, [35][36][37][38][39] and these individuals have been reported to have elevated m 1 A modification and the modification has negative effects on prognosis of their clinical conditions. [40][41][42][43][44] Therefore, their transcriptomic machinery would be more likely to install m 1 A onto the SARS-CoV-2 genome and they would do better for COVID-19 than the general population without considering other factors such as induced immunity. One scenario that can overcome the contradiction could be that m 1 A modification in these individuals are highly dynamic, which is likely.…”
Section: In Comparison Of Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%