2014
DOI: 10.17016/feds.2014.50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reputation and Liquidity Traps

Abstract: Can the central bank credibly commit to keeping the nominal interest rate low for an extended period of time in the aftermath of a deep recession? By analyzing credible plans in a sticky-price economy with occasionally binding zero lower bound constraints, I find that the answer is yes if contractionary shocks hit the economy with sufficient frequency. In the best credible plan, if the central bank reneges on the promise of low policy rates, it will lose reputation and the private sector will not believe such … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the review by Lars Svensson (2010) suggests, central banks have stuck to their inflation targets during extended periods, including across turnovers in the leadership of the central bank, suggesting a role for the reputation of the institution, not just the individuals in place, in shaping the reputational forces that influence the credibility of commitments. 25 Nakata (2014) has discussed how such reputational effects may make a post-ELB commitment policy credible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the review by Lars Svensson (2010) suggests, central banks have stuck to their inflation targets during extended periods, including across turnovers in the leadership of the central bank, suggesting a role for the reputation of the institution, not just the individuals in place, in shaping the reputational forces that influence the credibility of commitments. 25 Nakata (2014) has discussed how such reputational effects may make a post-ELB commitment policy credible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The history dependence embodied in optimal commitment policy or the inertial Taylor rule with lagged shadow policy rate is time‐inconsistent, as discussed by Werning () and Nakata (), among others. Some policymakers have stated that this time‐inconsistency problem limits the extent to which the central bank can adopt history‐dependent policies (see the list of quotes from policymakers in Nakata 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. The history dependence embodied in optimal commitment policy or the inertial Taylor rule with lagged shadow policy rate is time-inconsistent, as discussed by Werning (2012) and Nakata (2014), among others. Some policymakers have stated that this time-inconsistency problem limits the extent to which the central bank can adopt history-dependent policies (see the list of quotes from policymakers in Nakata 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some policymakers have stated that this time-inconsistency problem limits the extent to which the central bank can adopt history-dependent policies (see the list of quotes from policymakers in Nakata 2015). Several authors have studied ways to make this history-dependent policy time-consistent (see, e.g., Nakata 2014, Berriel and Mendes 2015, Bhattarai, Eggertsson, and Gafarov 2015. policy rate is constrained at the ZLB than when it is not, and that the multiplier is less than one at the ZLB.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%