Reputational Status of Organizations in Technical Systems

Shrum, Wesley; Wuthnow, Robert

doi:10.1086/228828

Cited by 144 publications

(70 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Incentives may be monetary or come in non-financial forms (NHCPI 2002), such as intrinsic rewards or burden of learning new skills, more or less pleasant work environments, and individual or organizational reputation (Weick 1979;Schrum and Wuthnow 1988). From the perspective of economics, stakeholders are likely to implement a particular intervention if they perceive the expected benefits to exceed the expected costs, i.e., when there is a "business case" for quality improvement (Schoenbaum et al 2004;Leatherman et al 2003).…”

Section: Policies and Incentivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interventions in Organizational and Community Context: A Framework for Building Evidence on Dissemination and Implementation in Health Services Research

Mendel

Meredith

Schoenbaum

et al. 2007

Adm Policy Ment Health

323

355

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effective dissemination and implementation of evidence-based health interventions within community settings is an important cornerstone to expanding the availability of quality health and mental health services. Yet it has proven a challenging task for both research and community stakeholders. This paper presents the current framework developed by the UCLA/RAND NIMH Center to address this research-to-practice gap by: 1) providing a theoretically-grounded understanding of the multi-layered nature of community and healthcare contexts and the mechanisms by which new practices and programs diffuse within these settings; 2) distinguishing among key components of the diffusion process-including contextual factors, adoption, implementation, and sustainment of interventions-showing how evaluation of each is necessary to explain the course of dissemination and outcomes for individual and organizational stakeholders; 3) facilitating the identification of new strategies for adapting, disseminating, and implementing relatively complex, evidence-based healthcare and improvement interventions, particularly using a community-based, participatory approach; and 4) enhancing the ability to meaningfully generalize findings across varied interventions and settings to build an evidence base on successful dissemination and implementation strategies.

show abstract

Section: Policies and Incentivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interventions in Organizational and Community Context: A Framework for Building Evidence on Dissemination and Implementation in Health Services Research

Mendel

Meredith

Schoenbaum

et al. 2007

Adm Policy Ment Health

323

355

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In different technology-intensive industries, Shrum and Wuthnow (1988) found that reputational status is indeed a function of the firm's total number of ties to other firms. Status in turn has a positive effect on exchange: actors with higher status are more preferred exchange partners (Thye, 2000).…”

Section: Centrality In Licensing Exchange Networkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Licensing Exchange - Insights from the Biopharmaceutical Industry

Wuyts

Dutta

2007

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Licensing out technologies is a main source of revenue for dedicated technology firms. While licensing exchange has received very little attention in prior marketing literature, it is economically important and poses particular challenges. One major obstacle for obtaining new licensing deals is the information asymmetry between licensors and licensees. The main premise of this study is that the variation among dedicated technology firms of the number of new licensing deals that they obtain can be explained by their voluntary disclosure of strategic information and their position in the industry's licensing and social networks. An empirical study of the biopharmaceutical industry shows that, while voluntarily disclosing strategic information enables dedicated biotechnology firms to sign more new licensing deals, firms should be careful not to disclose too much information. As to network structure, dedicated biotechnology firms with more central positions in the licensing exchange network obtain more new licensing deals, but again, the effect has an inverted-U shape, indicating a dark side of network centrality. Finally, the study provides evidence that licensing exchange is socially embedded. A central position in the social network of board interlocks leads to more new licensing deals. Dedicated technology firms can use these insights to address practical questions, such as how much strategic information they should reveal, as well as to set long-term directions regarding network position.3

show abstract

“…They transmit and refract information among firms and their stakeholders ). An empirical study of firms involved in nuclear-waste disposal and photovoltaic cell development demonstrated how in both these industries reputational status depended, not only on structural factors like company size and economic performance, but also on a firm's position in the interaction networks linking firms in each institutional field (Shrum and Wuthnow, 1988).…”

Section: The Sociological Viewmentioning

confidence: 99%