2016 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icce.2016.7430575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Request adaptation for adaptive streaming over HTTP/2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adaptive streaming over HTTP/2 [192], [260]- [262], client-based prefetching [263], Meta-heuristics for increased client QoE-awareness [264], [60] Improving the video quality and reduce the live latency using HTTP/2 protocol. HTTP/2 is a server push mechanism that also increase link utilization compared to HTTP/1.1 [260].…”
Section: Application-level Optimizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptive streaming over HTTP/2 [192], [260]- [262], client-based prefetching [263], Meta-heuristics for increased client QoE-awareness [264], [60] Improving the video quality and reduce the live latency using HTTP/2 protocol. HTTP/2 is a server push mechanism that also increase link utilization compared to HTTP/1.1 [260].…”
Section: Application-level Optimizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast with traditional pull-based HAS approaches, where the client has to make an explicit request for new segments. In light of these advantages, the server push performance has been extensively investigated in order to reduce the live latency and the initial delay in HAS [15,69,100,104,105,107]. Wei et al have been the first to investigate the performance of HTTP/2 server push in the context of adaptive streaming [104].…”
Section: Application Level Optimizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach allows to eliminate video freezes and obtain 15% higher quality compared to classical adaptive streaming over HTTP/1.1. The buffer filling level can be included directly into the computation of the K value [69]. In this work, the optimal K is set in order to keep the buffer filling level above a specific threshold.…”
Section: Application Level Optimizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, the so-called k-push strategy has been adopted, where the client receives k video segments with one request [4]. Prior studies have confirmed the promising performance with short segment duration of such a strategy in reducing request-related overheads [5,12,13], startup and delivering delay [3,4], unnecessary RTTs [3,14], power consumption [13,15] and in improving the QoE [16,17]. However, those existing works only focused on optimizing the performance of one client without considering the impact on other clients sharing the same bandwidth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%