Required data elements for interprofessional rounds through the lens of multiple professions

A systematic review of evidence-based practices for clinical education and health care delivery in the clinical teaching unit

“…Sixteen studies focused on interprofessional rounds, 21,22,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] of which 9 studies were either medium or highquality (Table 3). Reported benefits of this practice included a perceived increase in collaboration 22,62,65 and communication 21,22,57,60,65,66 among health care teams; a highquality time series study also reported earlier discharge times.…”

“…Interprofessional rounds may improve team collaboration and communication, and enhance discharge planning. 21,22,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] Moderate confidence…”

“…High quality 56,63 Medium quality 21,22,55,61,62,64,65 Low quality 54,[57][58][59][60]66,67 Geographic wards may improve team efficiency and interprofessional collaboration. 14,28,56,68 Moderate confidence There are moderate concerns regarding adequacy and relevance.…”

“…professionals, 22 contributed to perceptions of increased patient safety, 22,62 improved interprofessional communication (especially with nurses) 21,22,62 and enhanced efficiency, as residents were paged less frequently by nurses. 21 However, although interprofes sional rounds often focused on discharge planning, 59,60,62,63 2 high quality randomized trials showed that implementing structured interprofessional rounds did not change average length of stay, 62 though they significantly reduced rates of adverse events. 61…”

Realizing the Potential of Social Determinants Data: A Scoping Review of Approaches for Screening, Linkage, Extraction, Analysis and Interventions

“…Studies focused on engagement with populations and leveraged a variety of technologies to support collection and documentation processes. Few studies (n = 9) included interviews of patients and clinicians, engagement with communities, focus groups, town hall meetings and the like[46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. Other studies (n = 7) collected SDoH information using paper-based entry, iPads/tablets, patient or clinician-facing web portals and other web-based toolkits and forms[55][56][57][58][59][60][61].Several studies made use of publicly available, external data resources to infer structural SDoH information for a given population.…”