2018
DOI: 10.1299/jamdsm.2018jamdsm0034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Requirement analysis considering uncertain customer preference for Kansei quality of product

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the weight of the evaluation indexes mainly considers the importance of customer demands, and seldom takes into account the satisfaction degree of customer preferences. For Kansei quality of the product, evaluation grid method and regression analysis method are used to evaluate the customer preference [30]. A way to measure the relative indifference between different characteristics called Fuzzy Indifference Degree (FID) is proposed to select the product closest to their preferences [31].…”
Section: B Customer Demand Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the weight of the evaluation indexes mainly considers the importance of customer demands, and seldom takes into account the satisfaction degree of customer preferences. For Kansei quality of the product, evaluation grid method and regression analysis method are used to evaluate the customer preference [30]. A way to measure the relative indifference between different characteristics called Fuzzy Indifference Degree (FID) is proposed to select the product closest to their preferences [31].…”
Section: B Customer Demand Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous research [29], the DBC method has been used, which allows for customers to participate in the process of product design, resulting in modification and adjustment of the product to the customers' requirements. Therefore, in the context of processing and determination of products' quality level, the main methods used have been Kansei (KE) [24,[30][31][32], Quality Function Deployment (QFD) [33][34][35][36], Kano [16,34,37,38], and the Bayesian Network (Naive Bayesian Classifier) [39][40][41][42][43]. These methods were also integrated [31,32,34,38,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods were also integrated [31,32,34,38,44]. The use of the Kansei method (KE) [24,[30][31][32] included determination of the psychology of customers, and then matching customers to Kansei words. This method was integrated with the QFD method to precisely determine both quantitative (technical) and qualitative (emotional) requirements [31,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Liu et al [29] used EGM of Miryoku engineering and fuzzy QFD to explore the design elements of a typical culture and creative product. Yamagishi et al [30] carried out EGM of Miryoku engineering to increase the robustness of the Kansei quality and maximize customer satisfaction for consumer electronic products. Conducting qualitative EGM interviews with high-involvement groups can record and summarize the semantic structure of expert logic from the actual behavior cases of users through pairwise comparison of various features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%