Requirements Prioritization

Berander, Patrik; Andrews, Anneliese

doi:10.1007/3-540-28244-0_4

Cited by 188 publications

(150 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

144

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, no more information presents that one requirement has more or less priority than others inside the same priority (Ma, 2009). The numerical assignment is discussed by a number of studies such as (Berander, Andrews, 2005), (Bradner, 1997), (IEEE-STD,1998), (Karlsson et al, 2006), (Leffingwell & Widrig, 2000) and (Sommerville & Sawyer, 1997).…”

Section: ) Very Important (Critical)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Requirements Prioritization Techniques Comparison

Hudaib¹,

Masadeh²,

Qasem³

et al. 2018

MAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Requirements prioritization is considered as one of the most important approaches in the requirement engineering process. Requirements prioritization is used to define the ordering or schedule for executing requirement based on their priority or importance with respect to stakeholders' viewpoints. Many prioritization techniques for requirement have been proposed by researchers, and there is no single technique can be used for all projects types. In this paper we give an overview of the requirement process and requirement prioritization concept. We also present the most popular techniques used to prioritize the software project requirements and a compression between these techniques. On the other hand, we spot the light on the importance of involving the non-functional requirements prioritization because of the great effects of non-functional on project success and quality; some approaches that used in prioritize non-functional requirements are discussed in this paper, in addition a general model is proposed based on reviewing the prioritization techniques in order to suggests a best suited technique for specific projects according to decision makers parameters.

show abstract

Section: ) Very Important (Critical)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cumulative Voting (CV) which is another name of hundred-dollar method that was proposed by (Berander, & Andrews, 2005), and (Hatton, 2007). Hundred-dollar is considered as a simple and straight forward technique for preferring requirements.…”

Section: Hundred Dollar (100$) Techniquementioning

confidence: 99%

Requirements Prioritization Techniques Comparison

Hudaib¹,

Masadeh²,

Qasem³

et al. 2018

MAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Binary Search Tree Binary search tree method by Hopcroft, Aho and Ullman [11] is another technique used for sorting requirements. Berander and Andrews [12] suggested simple ranking requirement prioritisation technique. In simple ranking, requirements are ranged from 1 to n where n is any integer value.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Combined AHP and Source of Power Schemes for Prioritising Requirements Applied on a Human Resources

Ibrahim

Nosseir

2016

MATEC Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract.Abstract. There are a number of scenarios where prioritising is one of the critical activities. The requirements engineering process domain uses different approaches to prioritise requirements. Most of these approaches overlook the influence of the stockholders politics and power among dimensions of the process. This paper expands the scope of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and uses the source of power approach that accounts for the political and authoritative powers typically found among stakeholders. The suggested model weaves both approaches using a well-defined process model and applies this model on a case of prioritising the requirements of human resources software in a multinational company.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, quality requirements often have the before-mentioned continuous scale, trade-offs among each other, and effect on the utility of each other and the utility of functional requirements [1]. Thus, prioritization techniques for functional requirements are not properly applicable to quality requirements [1,3].…”

Section: Quality Requirements Prioritization In Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research Preview: Prioritizing Quality Requirements Based on Software Architecture Evaluation Feedback

Koziolek

2012

Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context and motivation Quality requirements are a main driver for architectural decisions of software systems. Although the need for iterative handling of requirements and architecture has been identified, current architecture design processes do not provide systematic, quantitative feedback for the prioritization and cost/benefit considerations for quality requirements. Question/problem Thus, in practice stakeholders still often state and prioritize quality requirements before knowing the software architecture, i.e. without knowledge about the quality dependencies, conflicts, incurred costs, and technical feasibility. However, as quality properties usually are cross-cutting architecture concerns, estimating the effects of design decisions is difficult. Thus, stakeholders cannot reliably know the appropriate required level of quality. Principal ideas/results In this research proposal, we suggest an approach to generate feedback from quantitative architecture evaluation to requirements engineering, in particular to requirements prioritization. We propose to use automated design space exploration techniques to generate information about available trade-offs. Final quality requirement prioritization is deferred until first feedback from architecture evaluation is available. Contribution In this paper, we present the process model of our approach enabling feedback to requirement prioritization and describe application scenarios and an example. In this paper, we present the process model of our approach enabling feedback to requirement prioritization and describe application scenarios and an example.

show abstract

Requirements Prioritization

Cited by 188 publications

References 34 publications

Requirements Prioritization Techniques Comparison

Requirements Prioritization Techniques Comparison

A Combined AHP and Source of Power Schemes for Prioritising Requirements Applied on a Human Resources

Research Preview: Prioritizing Quality Requirements Based on Software Architecture Evaluation Feedback

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About