2004
DOI: 10.26686/nzaroe.v0i14.1485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rescuing NCEA: Some Possible Ways Forward

Abstract: This article examines the issue of “variability” that resulted in widespread media criticisms of the 2004 Scholarship examinations in New Zealand. The authors argue that the New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA) and the Ministry of Education have taken an ideological position on the use of standards-based assessment, ignoring the evidence both from the literature and from international experience that recognises the immense difficulties in implementing a “pure” form of standards-based assessment. The art… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without the need to restate the well‐documented problems of the NCEA implementation (see e.g. Elley et al. 2004), it may be safe to conclude that geography teachers have not been immune to the impact NCEA has had on professional practice (Fastier 2007).…”
Section: The Impact Of the National Certificate Of Educational Achievmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Without the need to restate the well‐documented problems of the NCEA implementation (see e.g. Elley et al. 2004), it may be safe to conclude that geography teachers have not been immune to the impact NCEA has had on professional practice (Fastier 2007).…”
Section: The Impact Of the National Certificate Of Educational Achievmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NCEA assessment reform has dominated the landscape of New Zealand's secondary schools since its introduction over 2002-2004. Without the need to restate the welldocumented problems of the NCEA implementation (see e.g. Elley et al 2004), it may be safe to conclude that geography teachers have not been immune to the impact NCEA has had on professional practice (Fastier 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is something of a British Commonwealth versus American divide in terminology. While manageability is the most common term used by British writers (Connor, 1999;Weedan, Winter, & Broadfoot, 2002) and in the New Zealand context (Allen, Crooks, Hearn, & Irwin, 1997;Elley et al 2004;Hall, 2004;Hill, 2003;Knight, 2000), other writers, particularly American commentators, use the term utility (Baker, Linn, & Herman 1996;Messick, 1992).…”
Section: Manageability In the General Assessment Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the introduction of the National Certificate of Educational Achievement concern was raised about the new qualifications framework and the associated assessment process for secondary schooling. This provided a new approach; there was little international research and for such a substantial policy change it was not underpinned by empirical research (Elley, Hall & Marsh, 2004). The issues were raised and debated across New Zealand.…”
Section: The Assessment Debate In New Zealandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Issues of variability amongst students receiving scholarships were raised by Elley et al (2004) as were the issues of moderation. Elley (2002) was critical of the level of difficulty of standards across different subjects both for achieving the standard as well as gaining an Excellence grade.…”
Section: The Assessment Debate In New Zealandmentioning
confidence: 99%