2023
DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2241127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research anomalies in criminology: How serious? How extensive over time? And who was responsible?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the results obtained might have been due to random chance, even when the results were statistically significant, as remains true for all statistical testing. Future research might well examine the entire corpus of research by Dr. Stewart or other co-authors to determine if similar patterns would be found [20]. Other types of anomalies seen in the retracted articles [7,10] should be investigated further.…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Some of the results obtained might have been due to random chance, even when the results were statistically significant, as remains true for all statistical testing. Future research might well examine the entire corpus of research by Dr. Stewart or other co-authors to determine if similar patterns would be found [20]. Other types of anomalies seen in the retracted articles [7,10] should be investigated further.…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Methodological and practical sources of the replication crisis in criminology have been discussed in depth (see Chin et al 2023;Pridemore et al 2018;Schumm et al 2023;Sweeten 2020;Wooditch et al 2020); we focus on the theoretical sources. Niemeyer et al's (2022) simulations examining possible contributions of weak theory to the field's burgeoning credibility crisis represented the first effort by criminologists to link longstanding theoretical concerns in criminology with false-positive research findings.…”
Section: Credibility Crisis In Criminologymentioning
confidence: 99%