Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Introduction. Managing the lifelong learning environment requires a certain understanding of the educational needs and demands of learners of different categories. However, there is not enough research devoted to the psychological aspects of non-formal and informal learning of working subjects. The aim of the study is to characterize the main forms of learning, inducing and sustaining motivation, engagement and self-regulation of learning among employed and self-employed individuals. Materials and Methods. The study used the methods of theoretical analysis of the problem, testing and survey with the use of educational experience diagnostics methodology and author's questionnaires based on the Informal Learning Questionnaire and Academic Motivation Scale. The empirical sampling encompassed 295 people, including 143 self-employed and 152 employed. Results. The results showed the diversity of forms of lifelong learning used by employed persons, as well as the polymotivated nature of this activity. It was found that professional and cognitive motives are the most pronounced among the employed and self-employed. Respondents are motivated to learning by the desire for self-improvement, professional development objectives, interest in the subject of training, the need for new knowledge and skills. It is proved that self-employed persons, compared to employed persons, have a higher level of involvement, self-regulation of learning and intrinsic motivation focused on professional and personal growth and diverse interests. Discussion and Conclusion. The results of the study expand scientific ideas about lifelong learning and for the first time demonstrate the specificity of involvement and motivation for learning individuals with different employment status. The materials of the article will be useful for researchers, specialists in human resources development, marketers of the education segment, and developers of additional educational programs.
Introduction. Managing the lifelong learning environment requires a certain understanding of the educational needs and demands of learners of different categories. However, there is not enough research devoted to the psychological aspects of non-formal and informal learning of working subjects. The aim of the study is to characterize the main forms of learning, inducing and sustaining motivation, engagement and self-regulation of learning among employed and self-employed individuals. Materials and Methods. The study used the methods of theoretical analysis of the problem, testing and survey with the use of educational experience diagnostics methodology and author's questionnaires based on the Informal Learning Questionnaire and Academic Motivation Scale. The empirical sampling encompassed 295 people, including 143 self-employed and 152 employed. Results. The results showed the diversity of forms of lifelong learning used by employed persons, as well as the polymotivated nature of this activity. It was found that professional and cognitive motives are the most pronounced among the employed and self-employed. Respondents are motivated to learning by the desire for self-improvement, professional development objectives, interest in the subject of training, the need for new knowledge and skills. It is proved that self-employed persons, compared to employed persons, have a higher level of involvement, self-regulation of learning and intrinsic motivation focused on professional and personal growth and diverse interests. Discussion and Conclusion. The results of the study expand scientific ideas about lifelong learning and for the first time demonstrate the specificity of involvement and motivation for learning individuals with different employment status. The materials of the article will be useful for researchers, specialists in human resources development, marketers of the education segment, and developers of additional educational programs.
The Discussion section in the manuscript of an original empirical study is the most creative and challenging part to construct. Incorrect discussion of results in many manuscripts submitted to scientific journals often leads to their rejection, even if the results themselves hold potential significance for the scientific community. The absence or poor quality of interpretation of results by the authors can negatively affect the overall perception of the study by readers. The most complete functional implementation of the Discussion section is achieved by adhering to its rhetorical structure. The purpose of this article is to analyze the functions, content, and rhetorical organization of the Discussion section of an original empirical study. The main function of the Discussion section is to interpret and explain the significance of the study’s results, highlight the current state of knowledge on the stated problem, and explain new aspects arising from the results obtained. Authors also need to specify the external validity of the data and demonstrate how these data can be generalized. The most effective way to implement the stated function is by relying on a model of the interdisciplinary rhetorical structure of the Discussion section, which can be modified according to the conventions of the discipline and the characteristics of the specific study. Depending on the study’s logic, certain rhetorical moves or steps of the structure may be omitted; however, a more comprehensive list of moves provides a more thorough interpretation of the results. Understanding the content of each move and its steps allows authors to present all necessary information regarding the obtained results in a way that ensures their objective and unambiguous perception by readers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.