Research Based Learning in Higher Education: A Review of Literature

Abstract

Background: Teaching and learning in a university setting are distinctive from other types of Higher Education, due to its direct relationship with research. The increasing need to integrate teaching and research in Higher Education has led academics to incorporate authentic research experiences in their classes. This specific teaching-research nexus, labeled as Research-based learning (RBL) is designed around inquiry activities stimulating students to engage in real-life research by conducting their own experiments. Purpose: There is gap in the literature when it comes to reviews that focus on RBL in Higher Education, particularly with a focus on the Engineering and Science domain. In our literature review analysis, we focus on: (1) students' research skills as developed by the RBL context, (2) the nature of Engineering and Science programs/courses that have adopted RBL approaches, (3) the impact of the RBL approach on students, (4) the key research variables included and the research methods used, (5) and the amount of time spent in RBL experiences. Method: A systematic review of the literature was carried out, based on screening articles in the Web of Science and adopting the following inclusion criteria: (1) peer-reviewed journal or proceeding articles from 2000 to 2016 written in the English language, (2) related to RBL empirical work, (3) focused on students as participants, (4) carried out in Engineering and Science class settings, (5) set up in Higher Education contexts. Using the key search descriptors "research based learning", "research based", and "teaching research nexus", initially 2492 articles were identified but only 33 fully met the criteria. To broaden the available dataset, we identified further other 17 additional articles building on the reference lists of the selected studies. This increased the number of articles to be analyzed to 50. Next, the articles were analyzed and synthesized following the above analysis categories. Conclusions: The study presented a first overview of the available literature in terms of RBL within Engineering and Science fields in Higher Education. The 50 selected studies helped developing an indepth picture of the latest RBL developments. The results show Chemistry and Biology were the dominant courses implementing RBL; usually in lab settings. The most emphasized research skills were "analyzing data", "conducting research" and "communicating results". "Interest in research or the subject" and "scientific/critical thinking and attitudes towards research" were the key dependent variables. Most RBL interventions reported positive results, building on quantitative methods and lasting 1 to 2 semesters as the typical time frame. The review results put forward a sound base to develop decisions about the implementation of RBL in future higher education settings. At the same time, they reflect gaps to be addressed: (1) empirical studies that comprise a more comprehensive study of the research cycle, (2) research designs to study the impact of RBL that include mediating or...

Research skills that men and women developed at university and then used in workplaces

“…This debate has been ongoing since Dewey's time and is current. For example, positive outcomes of RBL for students were found by Camacho, Valcke, and Chiluiza (2017), in their review of the literature, and by Mellander and Svärdh (2018) in their large-scale longitudinal study. Sweller (2016) maintains that minimal instruction is counterproductive in curriculum design, and that RBL should be avoided.…”

Authentic learning in the undergraduate social research methods classroom: students’ perspectives on project-based pedagogy

“…This has led to calls for creating more opportunities for disseminating undergraduate research and, in some locations, to the organization of undergraduate conferences where students have the opportunity to present their work to a wider audience (e.g., Hersh, Hiro, and Asarnow 2011;Swift et al 2012;Walkington 2015). Students' experience of the dissemination of research findings in a conference may help them develop and improve several academic and professional skills, such as their academic writing, their ability to focus on project requirements and their personal investment in the project (Camacho et al 2017;Kneale and Edwards-Jones 2016;Little 2020).…”

‘Publish or Perish’: a Transformation of Professional Value in Creating Literate Academics in the 21st Century

“…Researches have been conducted related to competence in scientific publications. For example, research in the UK shows that students' perspectives stated that lecturers who already have scientific publications and have been published are considered more credible and would be able to more effectively link their research activities with their learning experiences (Camacho et al, 2017;Schofield & Burton, 2015). Furthermore, Intan et al (2019) explored the effect of publication requirements on work stress on academic lecturers in Indonesia, using the Job Demand-Control-Support (JDC-S) model.…”