Research Consensus Panel Follow-Up: A Systematic Review and Update on Cost Research in IR

Bulman, J S; Malik, Maria; Lindquester, Will S.; Hawkins, C. Matthew; Liu, Raymond; Sarwar, Ammar

doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2023.03.001

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 67 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Seven articles were found when searching for systematic reviews of TDABC on PubMed. The most recent, published in 2023, is specific for interventional radiology ( Bulman et al, 2023 ) and spine surgeries ( Ali et al, 2023 ). In 2022, a systematic review that evaluated the cost measure of value-based healthcare but did not specifically focus on TDABC studies was published ( Leusder et al, 2022 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improvements in technology and the expanding role of time-driven, activity-based costing to increase value in healthcare provider organizations: a literature review

Etges,

Jones,

Liu

et al. 2024

Front. Pharmacol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThis study evaluated the influence of technology on accurately measuring costs using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) in healthcare provider organizations by identifying the most recent scientific evidence of how it contributed to increasing the value of surgical care.MethodsThis is a literature-based analysis that mainly used two data sources: first, the most recent systematic reviews that specifically evaluated TDABC studies in the surgical field and, second, all articles that mentioned the use of CareMeasurement (CM) software to implement TDABC, which started to be published after the publication of the systematic review. The articles from the systematic review were grouped as manually performed TDABC, while those using CM were grouped as technology-based studies of TDABC implementations. The analyses focused on evaluating the impact of using technology to apply TDABC. A general description was followed by three levels of information extraction: the number of cases included, the number of articles published per year, and the contributions of TDABC to achieve cost savings and other improvements.ResultsFourteen studies using real-world patient-level data to evaluate costs comprised the manual group of studies. Thirteen studies that reported the use of CM comprised the technology-based group of articles. In the manual studies, the average number of cases included per study was 160, while in the technology-based studies, the average number of cases included was 4,767. Technology-based studies, on average, have a more comprehensive impact than manual ones in providing accurate cost information from larger samples.ConclusionTDABC studies supported by technologies such as CM register more cases, identify cost-saving opportunities, and are frequently used to support reimbursement strategies based on value. The findings suggest that using TDABC with the support of technology can increase healthcare value.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%