Research education and training in otolaryngology: Meeting summary and research opportunities

Grandis, Jennifer R.; Battey, James F.; Califf, Robert M.; Chole, Richard A.; Gantz, Bruce J.; Gates, George A.; Gorelic, Lester; Hannley, Maureen; Hardwick, Kevin S.; Harris, Jeffrey P.; Kapoor, Wishwa N.; Lai, Stephen Y.; Lalwani, Anil K.; Minor, Lloyd B.; Nadol, Joseph P.; Post, J. Christopher; Roland, Peter S.; Schechter, Alan M.; Schuller, David E.; Sklare, Daniel A.; Wackym, Phillip A.; Weber, Randal S.; Weymuller, Ernest A.; Wolf, Gregory T.; Woodson, Gayle E.

doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2006.05.014

Cited by 13 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous articles have raised concerns for inadequate time for research and the importance of research training during residency. 1,6,21 Our data raise several interesting points regarding a new era of resident research. Principally, evidence for increased publications in the work hourrestricted era and research productivity by T32 residents suggest that additional time for research is effective at driving scholarly productivity during training.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 77%

Increased Resident Research over an 18‐Year Period

Chen

Kozin

Sethi

et al. 2015

Otolaryngol.--head neck surg.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 77%

Increased Resident Research over an 18‐Year Period

Chen

Kozin

Sethi

et al. 2015

Otolaryngol.--head neck surg.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although research is considered integral to advancing the field of otolaryngology, the number of clinician-scientists in otolaryngology continues to diminish. 10 In a survey by Harris, residents were interested in research but were concerned about departmental support for research faculty. 11 Both faculty clinician scientists and residents in otolaryngology reported that a mentor or role model was a critical part to success in the clinicianscientist career path.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mentorship in otolaryngology residency: The resident perspective

2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The field of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery has seen a similar decline in surgeon‐scientists 2 . Early career otolaryngologists and residents cite potential lost income, family and work‐life balance, length of training, and poor departmental support as obstacles to pursuing a surgeon‐scientist career 3 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1 The field of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery has seen a similar decline in surgeon-scientists. 2 Early career otolaryngologists and residents cite potential lost income, family and work-life balance, length of training, and poor departmental support as obstacles to pursuing a surgeon-scientist career. 3 Additionally, a study by Narahari et al found that NIH funding to surgeon-scientists, including otolaryngologists, has decreased over the last several years, making it even more challenging for surgeons to have successful research careers.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Long‐Term Academic Outcomes of Triological Society Research Career Development Award Recipients

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives/Hypothesis Each year, the Triological Society awards several Research Career Development Awards (CDAs) to support early‐career otolaryngologists. The objective of this study was to evaluate academic outcomes of CDA recipients including National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding acquisition and h‐index. A secondary objective was to appraise gender differences in outcomes among awardees. Study Design Cross‐sectional study. Methods Recipients' practice setting, degree type, academic rank, and leadership titles were determined through review of academic and private practice profiles in October 2019. NIH funding was assessed using the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tool and the h‐index was calculated using the Scopus database. Results Between 2004 and 2019, 70 investigators received a CDA. Of the 65 awardees prior to 2019, 26 (40.0%) obtained NIH grants after the CDA. Having an MD/PhD or MD/master's was not associated with NIH funding attainment (P = .891) nor with higher funding total (P = .109). However, funding total was significantly higher for full professors compared to assistant professors (P = .022). The median h‐index among awardees was 16 (interquartile range = 11–21) and differed significantly by academic rank (P < .001). Moreover, 23 CDAs (32.9%) were awarded to women. However, fewer female recipients obtain NIH funding after the CDA compared to men (10.5% vs. 52.2%, P = .002), and they had significantly lower h‐indices than men (10 vs. 17, P < .001). Conclusions As a cohort, CDA awardees achieve higher academic success than academic otolaryngologists in general. However, female CDA recipients lag behind their male colleagues, highlighting the need for more research to uncover contributors to gender differences and ways to foster equity in research. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope, 131:288–293, 2021

show abstract

Research education and training in otolaryngology: Meeting summary and research opportunities

Abstract: F ew otolaryngologists-head and neck surgeons participate in comprehensive research training programs, resulting in a diminishing number of physician-scientists in the field.

Cited by 13 publications

References 4 publications

Increased Resident Research over an 18‐Year Period

Increased Resident Research over an 18‐Year Period

Mentorship in otolaryngology residency: The resident perspective

Long‐Term Academic Outcomes of Triological Society Research Career Development Award Recipients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About