2019
DOI: 10.21203/rs.2.15230/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Ethics Training Needs in Thailand and Vietnam

Abstract: Background To describe the types of research being conducted and the availability of research ethics training and research ethics review in Thailand and Vietnam. Methods An English survey with four major domains, Research Area, Societal Conditions, Research Ethics, and Basic Information was translated into Thai and Vietnamese by native training partners from the NIH Fogarty Research Ethics Training Program. Setting/Participants The survey was administered in two modes - an online survey distributed via an em… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, our research followed convenience sampling. Thus the social researchers who completed the survey might not reflect the entire social researcher's understanding and attitude toward research ethics in Vietnam as following the great experiences from other contexts [16], [23], [26], [29]- [31]. Secondly, this study involved the participants in three main cities of Vietnam (Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh city and Dang Nang city), and fewer participants from the provincial and regional universities/research institutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, our research followed convenience sampling. Thus the social researchers who completed the survey might not reflect the entire social researcher's understanding and attitude toward research ethics in Vietnam as following the great experiences from other contexts [16], [23], [26], [29]- [31]. Secondly, this study involved the participants in three main cities of Vietnam (Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh city and Dang Nang city), and fewer participants from the provincial and regional universities/research institutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%