Abstract:This Viewpoint discusses the rising trend in research output among matched US MD seniors in the National Resident Matching Program Main Residency Match from 2009 to 2020.
recently published "Research Fever-An Ever More Prominent Trend in the Residency Match," highlighting increased research output on residency applications from 2009 to 2020. 1 The article has raised questions in dermatology about best next steps. It is important to emphasize that research "fever" is not the fault of applicants but is rather a symptom of larger problems in our health care and educational systems.Research fever developed over years and is related to the competitive environment of residency applications despite a predicted physician shortage.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drs Ahmed and Adashi recently published “Research Fever—An Ever More Prominent Trend in the Residency Match,” highlighting increased research output on residency applications from 2009 to 2020 . The article has raised questions in dermatology about best next steps.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The downstream effects of these positive changes are fewer numeric metrics to evaluate applicants. As noted by Ahmed and Adashi, this leaves research output as a “tangible means of demonstrating one’s interest or academic inclination.” The overemphasis on research “numbers,” such as publications and presentations, is also riddled with inequities.…”
This Viewpoint offers potential solutions to research “fever,” which is characterized as a symptom of larger problems in our health care and educational systems rather than the fault of residency applicants.
recently published "Research Fever-An Ever More Prominent Trend in the Residency Match," highlighting increased research output on residency applications from 2009 to 2020. 1 The article has raised questions in dermatology about best next steps. It is important to emphasize that research "fever" is not the fault of applicants but is rather a symptom of larger problems in our health care and educational systems.Research fever developed over years and is related to the competitive environment of residency applications despite a predicted physician shortage.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drs Ahmed and Adashi recently published “Research Fever—An Ever More Prominent Trend in the Residency Match,” highlighting increased research output on residency applications from 2009 to 2020 . The article has raised questions in dermatology about best next steps.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The downstream effects of these positive changes are fewer numeric metrics to evaluate applicants. As noted by Ahmed and Adashi, this leaves research output as a “tangible means of demonstrating one’s interest or academic inclination.” The overemphasis on research “numbers,” such as publications and presentations, is also riddled with inequities.…”
This Viewpoint offers potential solutions to research “fever,” which is characterized as a symptom of larger problems in our health care and educational systems rather than the fault of residency applicants.
“…To the Editor We read with great interest the article by Ahmed and Adashi on the drastic increase in research output by residency applicants in the United States and the possible contributing factors.…”
“…In Reply We thank Ranganathan and Vervoort for the global perspective they bring to our Viewpoint detailing the notable recent rise in research output among US MD senior applicants to residency programs in the United States …”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.