Research groups of oncology co-authorship network in China

Yu, Qi; Shao, Hongbo; Duan, Zhiguang

doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0465-z

Cited by 28 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The USA published its first paper in 1978 and it was 15 years later that China published its first paper. However, China has undergone rapid growth in the number of articles produced over the last decade and possibly transcends USA in the year of 2015, which can be attributed to both increasing investment in scientific research and domestic concern for medical environment issues (Zhou and Leydesdorff 2006;Yu et al 2011). Figure 6 also shows that a major gap existed between China and the USA in terms of total number of citations for all articles per year from 1991 to 2006, excluding one outlier.…”

Section: Publication Performances: Institutes and Countriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A bibliometric analysis of micro/nano-bubble related research: current trends, present application, and future prospects

Zheng

Wang

et al. 2016

Scientometrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With great versatile characteristics, micro/nano-bubble related research have attracted much attention due to their extensive applications in the last half century.Researchers not merely focus on their physi-chemical properties, but also aim at their wellcontrolled generation methods and potential adhibition field. It can be expected that the future prospects of micro/nano-bubble related research will be tremendous and that there will be even more to be explored. In this case study, a bibliometric analysis was conducted to evaluate micro/nano-bubble related research from 1991 to 2014, based on the Science Citation Index EXPANDED database. The Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology with the highest h-index of 56 is the leading journal in this field, publishing 6.9 % of articles over this period, followed by Langmuir and Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. USA and the Univ Toronto, Canada were the most productive country and institution, respectively, while the USA, was the most internationally collaborative and had the highest hindex (111) of all countries. A new method named ''word cluster analysis'' was successfully applied to trace the research hotspots. Innovation in detection means and novel pathways for medical applications via micro/nano-bubble is considered to relate to the Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article

show abstract

Section: Publication Performances: Institutes and Countriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A bibliometric analysis of micro/nano-bubble related research: current trends, present application, and future prospects

Zheng

Wang

et al. 2016

Scientometrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The current widely used bibliometric analysis methods include co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling analysis, and co-occurrence analysis (e.g., co-citation analysis to explore the structure and evolution of a research field [28], bibliographic coupling analysis for patent grouping [29], co-occurrence analysis of authors to detect research groups and author productivity [30], and co-occurrence analysis of keywords for research hot spots [31]). Details of these methods are described as below.…”

Section: Bibliometric Analysis Methods and Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Visualizing the Intellectual Structure of Eye Movement Research in Cartography

Wang

Chen

Yuan

et al. 2016

IJGI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Eye movement research is a burgeoning frontier area in cartography that has attracted much attention from cartographers. However, the substantial amount of relevant literature poses a challenge for researchers aiming to obtain a rapid understanding of the intellectual structure of this research field. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the use of bibliometric analysis methods and multiple visual metaphors to visualize the intellectual structure of eye movement research in cartography, including the classic literature, research theme clusters, and research hotspots, etc. We also explain the use of geovisualization method, which can efficiently represent the spatial distribution of scientific power. Although the analysis results may not fully describe the whole research field, this method is generally applicable. We hope that it will not only help researchers to quickly grasp the evolution and trends of this research field, but will also become a novel method of merging geovisualization with knowledge visualization.

show abstract

“…Lu and Feng (19) proposed a new method called 'extensity centrality' to analyse the importance of authors in co-authorship networks. Yu et al (20) analysed research groups from the co-authorship network in the oncology field in China. Morel et al (21) used co-authorship network analysis to generate valuable information on the strategic planning, implementation and monitoring of the program launched by the Brazilian Government to fund scientific research.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of oncology research from 2001 to 2010: A scientometric perspective

Shao

et al. 2013

Oncology Reports

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the past half-century, the incidence of tumours has increased, resulting in cancer becoming one of the most lethal diseases in humans. In the present study, we elucidated the status of oncology research from 2001 to 2010. Studies published in 30 representative oncology journals were retrieved from the Web of Science (2001-2010) to compose our dataset. Knowledge domain visualisation, co-citation analysis and social network analysis methods were used. By mapping the oncology research performed from 2001 to 2010, we identified the primary research centres, including the top 20 institutions and countries and the 4 major oncology research fronts: i) the mechanism of abnormal oncogene expression; ii) tumour metastasis and angiogenesis; iii) the relationship between cancer cells and apoptosis; and iv) tumour vaccines. We also identified the 36 most collaborative academic communities, and multiple myeloma, angiogenesis and acute lymphocytic leukaemia were found to be the focuses of collaborative research in oncology from 2001 to 2010. Over the past 10 years, America has led oncology research, while China is the sole developing country to be ranked in the top 10. Analyses of the main research centres and forefronts may assist researchers in addressing these forefronts and ascertaining the developing trends in oncology. Analysis of the academic communities performing oncology research may provide scientific evidence and suggestions for policymakers to select the most prolific academic groups and leaders and to effectively manage and finance future oncology research. These selected groups and individuals will carry out additional joint undertakings and solve complex problems encountered in oncology research.

show abstract

Research groups of oncology co-authorship network in China

Cited by 28 publications

References 25 publications

A bibliometric analysis of micro/nano-bubble related research: current trends, present application, and future prospects

A bibliometric analysis of micro/nano-bubble related research: current trends, present application, and future prospects

Visualizing the Intellectual Structure of Eye Movement Research in Cartography

Analysis of oncology research from 2001 to 2010: A scientometric perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About