2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6091-970-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research in Mathematics Education in Australasia 2008–2011

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in recent decades, there has been less focus on this topic. For instance, in more recent editions of the Research in Mathematics Education in Australasia (RiMEA) 4-year reviews (Makar et al, 2016;Perry et al, 2012;Way et al, 2020) and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) handbooks (e.g., English, 2008;English & Kirshner, 2016;Lester, 2007), gender has not been a focus, instead being part of a broader equity discussion. In contrast, in earlier editions of both the RiMEA reviews (e.g., Forgasz et al, 2008;Perry et al, 2004) and the NCTM handbooks (e.g., Grouws, 1992), entire chapters were focused on gender.…”
Section: Innovations In "Gender Issues" Research In Mathematics Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in recent decades, there has been less focus on this topic. For instance, in more recent editions of the Research in Mathematics Education in Australasia (RiMEA) 4-year reviews (Makar et al, 2016;Perry et al, 2012;Way et al, 2020) and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) handbooks (e.g., English, 2008;English & Kirshner, 2016;Lester, 2007), gender has not been a focus, instead being part of a broader equity discussion. In contrast, in earlier editions of both the RiMEA reviews (e.g., Forgasz et al, 2008;Perry et al, 2004) and the NCTM handbooks (e.g., Grouws, 1992), entire chapters were focused on gender.…”
Section: Innovations In "Gender Issues" Research In Mathematics Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%