Research in the USA on COVID-19’s long-term effects: measures needed to ensure black, indigenous and Latinx communities are not left behind

Medeiros, Michelle; Edwards, Hillary; Baquet, Claudia R.

doi:10.1136/medethics-2021-107436

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1 The causative virus mutated repeatedly, and COVID-19 still affects public health and socioeconomics today. 4 In the past two years, there has been much discussion about human life, public health, and socioeconomic aspects, but it is debatable whether appropriate decisions have been made regarding the most prolonged global infectious disease ever experienced by humankind in recent years.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evidence-Based Policy Making during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Systematic Review

Matsuda

Yoshimura

2023

Prehosp. Disaster med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The aim of this systematic review was to collect evidence and recommendations for the applicability of the concept of evidence-based policy making (EBPM) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and to discuss the implementation of this concept from a medical science perspective. Methods: This study was performed according to the guidelines, checklist, and flow diagram of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020. An electronic literature search was conducted on September 20, 2022 using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases with the following search terms: “evidence based policy making” and “infectious disease.” Study eligibility assessment was performed based on the flow diagram of PRISMA 2020, and risk of bias assessment was performed using The Critical Appraisal Skills Program. Results: Eleven eligible articles were included in this review and divided into three groups as follows: early, middle, and late stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Basics of COVID-19 control were suggested in the early stage. The articles published in the middle stage discussed the importance of the collection and analysis of evidence of COVID-19 from around the world for the establishment of EBPM in the COVID-19 pandemic. The articles published in the late stage discussed the collection of large amounts of high-quality data and the development of methods to analyze them, as well as emerging issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions: This study revealed that the concept of EBPM applicable to emerging infectious disease pandemics changed between the early, middle, and late stages of the pandemic. The concept of EBPM will play an important role in medicine in the future.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evidence-Based Policy Making during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Systematic Review

Matsuda

Yoshimura

2023

Prehosp. Disaster med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Yet those defining the problems and formulating the solutions are typically not those most acutely affected. For example, the COVID pandemic has highlighted how women, minority groups and those in developing countries bear a much higher burden as a consequence of reduced access to support and resources (Benski et al, 2020;Ho and Dascalu, 2020;Medeiros et al, 2023). Similarly, the impacts of climate change, such as bushfires and intense tropical storms, disproportionately affect those who already have less, compounding their disadvantage.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Editorial: Science communication in difficult times: the intersectionality of science communication and risk communication during disasters and crises

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Community-Academic Partnerships for Health Research: An Iterative and Transparent Process of Patient Engagement Before the Research Begins

Mattingly,

Baquet,

Lance

et al. 2024

Ethnicity &Amp; Disease

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The root causes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disparities include longstanding systemic racial bias in economic advancement and care delivery, discrimination, lack of access, and social determinants of health. To address these causes, research institutions and health care systems must shift their lens from one that focuses solely on changing behaviors among underserved and vulnerable populations to one that is inward facing. Methods We worked with a community advisory board and an African American church that has partnered on research for more than a decade to identify community norms, needs, and key resources needed for establishing community-academic partnerships for COVID-19 testing. Participants were purposefully sampled with equal representation from 3 groups: (1) church members and leaders, (2) academic or organization researchers with experience in community-engaged research, and (3) community members with experience participating in community-engaged research. Participants engaged in a hands-on exercise in the church basement as part of a town hall-style meeting. Results Active discussion led to the identification of business model components salient to COVID-19 testing in an underserved Baltimore community, predominantly made up of African Americans. Our discussion identified key partners, activities, resources, costs, value propositions, community relationships, community groups, communication channels, and outputs for community buy-in. Conclusion Developing the business case for mutual trustworthiness to be better prepared for future pandemics and public health crises may foster more sustainable community-academic partnerships. Using a Business Model Canvas, we delineate the major components, activities, and value propositions that are needed to achieve authentic community-academic partnerships to advance health equity.

show abstract

Research in the USA on COVID-19’s long-term effects: measures needed to ensure black, indigenous and Latinx communities are not left behind

Cited by 4 publications

References 18 publications

Evidence-Based Policy Making during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Systematic Review

Evidence-Based Policy Making during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Systematic Review

Editorial: Science communication in difficult times: the intersectionality of science communication and risk communication during disasters and crises

Community-Academic Partnerships for Health Research: An Iterative and Transparent Process of Patient Engagement Before the Research Begins

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About