2020
DOI: 10.1111/vox.12995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research initiatives of blood services worldwide in response to the covid‐19 pandemic

Abstract: Background and Objectives While coronavirus (COVID‐19) is not transfusion‐transmitted, the impact of the global pandemic on blood services worldwide is complex. Convalescent plasma may offer treatment, but efficacy and safety are not established. Measuring seroprevalence in donors would inform public health policy. Here, we survey blood services around the world to assess the different research programmes related to COVID‐19 planned or in progress. Materials and Methods Blood collection services were surveyed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the first six months of the pandemic, 32/48 (73%) of blood services surveyed globally had already, or planned to, conduct seroprevalence studies to inform public health. 18 Sixteen countries, from North America (n = 3), South America (n = 1), Europe (n = 7), Africa (n = 2), and Asia (n = 3) have reported preliminary seroprevalence findings among blood donors, ranging from as high as 66% in parts of Brazil to as low as 0% in Jordan. 19,20 Among the G8 countries, the United States (US) was hardest hit by the COVID-19 pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within the first six months of the pandemic, 32/48 (73%) of blood services surveyed globally had already, or planned to, conduct seroprevalence studies to inform public health. 18 Sixteen countries, from North America (n = 3), South America (n = 1), Europe (n = 7), Africa (n = 2), and Asia (n = 3) have reported preliminary seroprevalence findings among blood donors, ranging from as high as 66% in parts of Brazil to as low as 0% in Jordan. 19,20 Among the G8 countries, the United States (US) was hardest hit by the COVID-19 pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood services worldwide have responded to the COVID‐19 pandemic by leveraging their operational capacity and access to a healthy population to conduct seroprevalence studies. Within the first six months of the pandemic, 32/48 (73%) of blood services surveyed globally had already, or planned to, conduct seroprevalence studies to inform public health 18 . Sixteen countries, from North America (n = 3), South America (n = 1), Europe (n = 7), Africa (n = 2), and Asia (n = 3) have reported preliminary seroprevalence findings among blood donors, ranging from as high as 66% in parts of Brazil to as low as 0% in Jordan 19,20 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, blood donors can provide convenient samples and are reasonably representative of the healthy adult population. More importantly, donation leftover samples could be used for COVID-19 antibody testing, and large numbers of donations are collected on a daily basis, which allow routine monitoring of seroprevalence over time (O'Brien et al, 2020). Finally, one limitation is the reliance on self-reported health events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was 3.1% in summer 2020 among Tyrolean blood donors. Our study underscores the suitability of blood donors as an epidemiologic sentinel surveillance system in order to identify local outbreaks and monitor diseases, as blood donors are easily available and representative, at least for the generally healthy subgroup of our population [ 16 , 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%