2021
DOI: 10.3390/jtaer16050098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Jungle on Online Consumer Behaviour in the Context of Web 2.0: Traceability, Frontiers and Perspectives in the Post-Pandemic Era

Abstract: In recent years, the study of online consumption behavior has gradually formed its research system and analysis model based on the inheritance of traditional research paradigms, focusing on the inner mechanism of consumption models explained by consumption activities. Online consumption is based on the research scenario of social e-commerce and forms a broad research network through the extension of consumer objects, consumer psychology, and consumer concepts. Although the theoretical constructs of online cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This section mainly refers to the scales of Zhang et al (2021), and Usai et al (2021), where Meral's scale is based on a component assessment of digital technology tools, resulting in seven central IoT, cyber‐physical systems, big data, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, additive manufacturing, and reality augmentation technology subscales. This study builds on this by further integrating seven scales, grouping them into two categories, technology access and technology adoption, and incorporating Blichfeldt's scale reflections on the two dimensions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This section mainly refers to the scales of Zhang et al (2021), and Usai et al (2021), where Meral's scale is based on a component assessment of digital technology tools, resulting in seven central IoT, cyber‐physical systems, big data, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, additive manufacturing, and reality augmentation technology subscales. This study builds on this by further integrating seven scales, grouping them into two categories, technology access and technology adoption, and incorporating Blichfeldt's scale reflections on the two dimensions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) whether digital innovation orientations will have an effect on the process of digital transformation, and what are the differences between them. Zhang et al (2021) uses the concept of DTA in the literature examining the relationship between digital technology and product service innovation performance in process industries and suggests that DTA is an important direction to guide manufacturing industries to adapt to competitive pressures and to realize the potential for competitive advantage based on digital technology. The connotation of DTA is heterogeneously resolved depending on the research perspective, and its mainstream research can be divided into three categories: (1) The first is based on the legal perspective of process innovation, defining DTA as the use of digital technology as a means of product and service innovation in manufacturing (Mackert et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Marketing factors (e.g., product design, price, promotion, packaging, positioning, and distribution) [38]; -Personality characteristics (such as age, gender, education, and income) [39]; -Psychological drivers (purchase motives, product perception, and attitude to the product) [40]; -Situational framework (the physical environment at the time of purchase, the environment, and the time factor) [41]; -Social determinants (social status, reference groups, and family) [42]; -Cultural factors (religion, social class) [43]; -Intergenerational behavior [44].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lu [61] emphasized that R&D management performance should pay special attention to the cost of technical input to avoid the occurrence of undesirable problems, such as an insufficient product R&D driving force and an excessive enterprise R&D burden. Alongside controlling the scale of R&D costs, companies also need to form a strong R&D team [62]. On the one hand, the R&D team cannot break through the cost constraints, resulting in a decrease in the enterprise's R&D efficiency.…”
Section: Performance Management In Product Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%