2013
DOI: 10.4324/9781410611284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Methods for Organizational Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
151
0
20

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
151
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Professional translators rendered all of the items into the Korean language, and then we gave English and Korean versions of the scales to bilingual experts to assess the appropriateness and the semantic equivalence of the translation. To ensure the content validity of the measures (Schwab, 2005) the review process was repeated until the bilingual experts detected no further inaccuracies in translation. Additionally, we followed Brislin's (1993) recommendation by backtranslating the scale items into English.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Professional translators rendered all of the items into the Korean language, and then we gave English and Korean versions of the scales to bilingual experts to assess the appropriateness and the semantic equivalence of the translation. To ensure the content validity of the measures (Schwab, 2005) the review process was repeated until the bilingual experts detected no further inaccuracies in translation. Additionally, we followed Brislin's (1993) recommendation by backtranslating the scale items into English.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then we gave the English and Chinese versions to bilingual experts in the university's Department of Foreign Languages to assess the appropriateness and semantic equivalence of the translation. To ensure content validity of the measures (Schwab, 2005), we repeated the review process until the bilingual experts detected no further inaccuracies in translation.…”
Section: Methods Participants and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process was repeated until no further improvement was proposed. These procedures were employed to ensure the content validity of the measures (Schwab 2005).…”
Section: Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%