Research methods in engineering design: a synthesis of recent studies using a systematic literature review

Abstract

The relation between scientific research and engineering design is fraught with controversy. While the number of academic PhD programs on design grows, because the discipline is in its infancy, there is no consolidated method for systematically approaching the generation of knowledge in this domain. This paper reviews recently published papers from four top-ranked journals in engineering design to analyse the research methods that are frequently used. The research questions consider the aim and contributions of the papers, as well as which experimental design and which sources of data are being used. Frequency tables show the high variety of approaches and aims of the papers, combining both qualitative and quantitative empirical approaches and analytical methods. Most of the papers focus on methodological concerns or on delving into a particular aspect of the design process. Data collection methods are also diverse without a clear relation between the type of method and the objective or strategy of the research. This paper aims to act as a valuable resource for academics, providing definitions related to research methods and referencing examples, and for researchers, shedding light on some of the trends and challenges for current research in the domain of engineering design.

Operationalizing community-based open scientific design research benchmarks: application to model-based architecture design synthesis

“…Moreover, design research is interdisciplinary, and using multiple research methods is difficult (Eckert et al, 2003). Literature reviews drew up extensive lists of research methods (Barth et al, 2011;Escudero-Mancebo et al, 2023) and design research objectives (Eckert et al, 2004;Cantamessa, 2003). When mixing research methods from multiple research areas, many challenges can arise due to the individual research cultures of each discipline involved.…”