2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.101934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Note: Comparison of the texture, structure, and composition of eggs from local Chinese chickens and a highly selected line of egg-type chickens and analysis of the effects of lipids on texture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The texture of TEY was measured using a texture analyzer. The TPA results included HAR, SPR, COH, GUM, CHE, and RES; these results have been previously reported ( Zhang et al, 2022 ). Because SPR heritability was 0, no GWAS was performed for SPR.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The texture of TEY was measured using a texture analyzer. The TPA results included HAR, SPR, COH, GUM, CHE, and RES; these results have been previously reported ( Zhang et al, 2022 ). Because SPR heritability was 0, no GWAS was performed for SPR.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The texture of TEY from the animals has been reported previously ( Zhang et al, 2022 ). The texture of TEY is evaluated mainly based on 6 indicators, namely HAR, SPR, COH, GUM, CHE, and RES; all 6 indicators exhibit a continuous normal distribution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the positive correlation between egg yolk moisture and egg yolk cohesiveness was not due to water content. Additionally, the size of surface pores of boiled egg yolk particles images viewed under scanning electron microscopy were large, due to increased cohesiveness, as a result of water evaporation during heating [ 43 ]. These changes can also be explained by variations in protein structure: alterations in the secondary structure of proteins exposed the hydrophobic bonds, and as such, led to formation of loose structures, which increased the water holding capacity [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%