2004
DOI: 10.1093/ps/83.10.1663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Note: Effects of Different Bone Preparation Methods (Fresh, Dry, and Fat-Free Dry) on Bone Parameters and the Correlations Between Bone Breaking Strength and the Other Bone Parameters

Abstract: A study was conducted to evaluate effects of different bone preparation methods on bone parameters and the correlations between bone breaking strength and the other bone parameters. Bone breaking strength is dramatically changed depending on bone preparation methods, whereas other bone parameters such as ash content and ash concentration are not significantly influenced by bone preparation methods. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of 3 bone preparations (fresh, dry, and fat-free dr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
25
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon re-thawing, a Dremel® moto tool (Dremel Model 4300-9/64 High Performance Variable Speed Rotary Tool, Dremel Inc. Racine, WI, USA) was used to remove the two epiphyses from the diaphysis. Marrow was removed with a sewing pin followed by a pipe cleaner, resulting in a smooth hollow cylinder, followed by oven drying at 65°C for 48 hours, as suggested by Kim et al [3].…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon re-thawing, a Dremel® moto tool (Dremel Model 4300-9/64 High Performance Variable Speed Rotary Tool, Dremel Inc. Racine, WI, USA) was used to remove the two epiphyses from the diaphysis. Marrow was removed with a sewing pin followed by a pipe cleaner, resulting in a smooth hollow cylinder, followed by oven drying at 65°C for 48 hours, as suggested by Kim et al [3].…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It ranges from 0.13 to 9.7, with a median value of 3.5 µg Mn/g dry bone. Taking into account a ratio of 1.6 between dry bone and wet bone (Kim et al 2004), it gives a median value of 2.2 µg Mn/g bone, which is higher than the ICRP value of 1 µg Mn/g bone. Another way to compare results is by taking into account the Mn/Ca ratio since Ca is the major component of bone and its proportion in bone is relatively stable.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Σημαντικότατη έρευνα έχει γίνει στην οστεοπενία χρησιμοποιώντας διάφορα οστά, όπως μηριαίο (Kim et al 2004), κερκίδα (Moore et al 1977, Wilson και Harner 1988), κλείδα (Adams et al 1970) και βραχιό-νιο (Gregory και Wilkins 1992, Fleming et al 1998a). Παρ' όλα αυτά, η περισσότερη έρευνα έχει διεξαχθεί πάνω στην αντοχή της κνήμης (Rowland et al 1967, Rowland και Harms 1970b, Frost et al 1990, Koutoulis 1998.…”
Section: ) ερευνητικές μέθοδοι διάγνωσης και μετρήσεων της οστεοπενίαςunclassified