2000
DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/30.6.867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research note. Gaining access to looked after children for research purposes: lessons learned

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is possible that some competitive-structured activities may be required to be in place 'in situ' in order to capture the boys' attention more rapidly in future studies. But this finding must also be held in the context of the great complexity of the young people's lives and the 'slipperiness' of this group of learners (Heptinstall, 2000).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it is possible that some competitive-structured activities may be required to be in place 'in situ' in order to capture the boys' attention more rapidly in future studies. But this finding must also be held in the context of the great complexity of the young people's lives and the 'slipperiness' of this group of learners (Heptinstall, 2000).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…First, this study involved a specific group of learners of mixed ability and who were in local authority care and this represented a number of significant challenges to be overcome (Heptinstall, 2000). The first and most obvious one was the concern for the safety and well-being of the young people who wished to participate.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of the physical restraint research, however, which was a national study funded by Save the Children, gaining access proved much more problematic and time-consuming. Access can be less of an event than a continuing process involving negotiations with a number of gatekeepers who may support or hinder the research (Hayes, 2005;Heptinstall, 2000;Masson, 2002;McGee, 1999). Hood, Kelley and Mayall (1996) refer to this as 'a hierarchy of gatekeeping' running from the organizational level to the parents and finally to the child (Hood et al, 1996, p. 120).…”
Section: Access Information Consent and Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hood, Kelley and Mayall (1996) refer to this as 'a hierarchy of gatekeeping' running from the organizational level to the parents and finally to the child (Hood et al, 1996, p. 120). Heptinstall (2000) demonstrates how gatekeepers' ability to block children's participation can constrain children and young people from making decisions themselves about involvement in research, effectively silencing them.…”
Section: Access Information Consent and Choicementioning
confidence: 99%