1992
DOI: 10.5465/256489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Notes. Distributive and Procedural Justice as Predictors of Satisfaction with Personal and Organizational Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

35
542
9
30

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 489 publications
(616 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
35
542
9
30
Order By: Relevance
“…29,35 If staff feel they are being treated fairly and justly, they are likely to perform better. If they are treated unfairly they will try to restore justice by holding back performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,35 If staff feel they are being treated fairly and justly, they are likely to perform better. If they are treated unfairly they will try to restore justice by holding back performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apabila kesejahteraan terpenuhi secara adil berkaitan dengan alokasi distribusi maka karyawan tersebut merasa nyaman dan puas. Hasil ini sejalan dengan penelitian terdahulu yang menjelaskan bahwa keadilan distributif berdampak pada outcomes seperti kepuasan dan kinerja (Folger dan Kovsky, 1989;McFarlin dan Sweeney, 1992;Sweeny dan McFarlin, 1993;Tang dan Baidwin, 1996;Skarlicky dan Folger, 1997;Colquitt, 2001;Colquiit et al, 2001;Viswesvaran dan Ones, 2002).…”
Section: Pengaruh Keadilan Distributif Kompensasi Kepuasan Dan Kinerunclassified
“…Demikian pula keadilan prosedural kompensasi juga berpengaruh positif pada kinerja perawat di rumah sakit tersebut. Hasil penelitian ini sejalan dengan hasil penelitian terdahulu yang menjelaskan bahwa keadila prosedural berdampak pada outcomes seperti kepuasan dan kinerja (Folger dan Konvsky, 1989;McFarlin dan Sweeney, 1992;Sweeney dan McFarlin, 1993;Tang dan Baldwin, 1996;Starlicky dan Forger, 1997;Colquitt, 2001;Colquitt et al, 2001;Viswesvaran dan Ones, 2002). Berkaitan dengan kinerja terlihat bahwa keadilan prosedural tidak berpengaruh pada kinerja perawat.…”
Section: Pengaruh Keadilan Prosedural Tunjangan Kinerja Pada Kepuaunclassified
“…Consequently, much research has examined the relationship between an organization's fair treatment of its employees or organizational justice and work attitudes and behaviors (Colquitt, Conlon, Wesson, Porter, & Ng, 2001;Cropanzono & Greenberg, 1997). The main effect approach that characterized the first wave of organizational justice research (Alexander & Ruderman, 1987;Folger & Konovsky, 1989;McFarlin & Sweeney, 1992) has since been complemented by research that seeks to explain the mechanisms that underpin the reported relationship between organizational justice and employee work outcomes (Konovsky & Pugh, 1994;Moorman, Blakely, & Niehoff, 1998). Although this stream of research has contributed substantially to explicating the social exchange basis of employee attitudes and behaviors, it is not without limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%